Skip to main content

Security report for concordiaclinic.lv

Concordia Clinic · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Concordia Clinic is a dental healthcare provider based in Riga, Latvia, specializing in orthodontics, jaw joint dysfunction treatment, therapy, and hygiene services. The clinic positions itself as a certified Invisalign treatment provider and official partner of RSU Stomatoloģijas institūts, targeting dental patients seeking professional dental care with financing options. The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap and various marketing and analytics tools, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response details are absent. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits domain trust verification, but website content and business information appear consistent and professional. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid business presence with room for improvement in security transparency and accessibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching concordiaclinic.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The clinic operates in the healthcare sector, focusing on dental services with a medium-sized business footprint. It leverages partnerships with academic institutions and offers financing to attract a broader customer base. The business model is service-oriented, targeting local and regional patients. Marketing efforts include social media engagement and email marketing via MailerLite. The website content is professionally maintained, supporting brand consistency and trust. No suspicious domains or affiliate programs were detected, indicating a focused business ecosystem.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes cookie consent mechanisms, indicating compliance with GDPR. Security headers are partially implemented, but there is no visible security policy or incident response contact information. No security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy is present. The use of third-party scripts and plugins necessitates regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate with recommendations to enhance transparency and security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  3. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Improve website accessibility features to comply with standards.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to reduce security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Concordia Clinic
Description
Dental treatment in Riga
Key services
Orthodontics, Jaw joint dysfunction treatment, Therapy and hygiene, Miofunctional therapy, Invisalign treatment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, MailerLite, YouTube Embed Plus, Swift Framework, Iconic Woo Quickview, Chaty
Frameworks
Swift Framework, Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security storage consent in Google Analytics config

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
MailerLite, Hellobar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based dental clinic site with professional design and clear service offerings.
  2. Content is in Latvian with some English language options.
  3. Includes social media integration and contact forms.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented, indicating GDPR awareness.
  5. No visible security or incident response policies published.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a combination of popular plugins and frameworks such as Swift Framework, Bootstrap, and jQuery. It integrates marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and MailerLite. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses modern fonts and responsive design but could improve accessibility compliance. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional online presence with opportunities for optimization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with concordiaclinic.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review concordiaclinic.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.