Skip to main content

Security report for conciergegroup.eu

Hospitality · N/a

Medium risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.conciergegroup.eu represents a small luxury travel and concierge service provider offering bespoke travel agency and concierge services under the brands 'Art of Travel' and 'CG21'. The site is professionally designed using Webflow CMS and hosting, with integration of Google Tag Manager for analytics. The content is focused on high-end personalized travel experiences and concierge solutions targeting affluent travelers. The website is accessible without any WAF or security challenges, indicating good availability and user access. From a technical perspective, the site uses modern web technologies including jQuery and Webflow's platform, ensuring a moderate level of performance and mobile optimization. However, accessibility features are basic and SEO optimization is minimal. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, which is a compliance gap. No contact information or incident response details are provided, limiting transparency. The WHOIS data for the domain is not publicly available due to EURid's privacy restrictions on .eu domains, which is typical and not suspicious. The domain age and registration details cannot be verified, but privacy protection is justified given the business type. Overall, the website presents a legitimate, niche luxury service provider with room for improvement in security and compliance transparency. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, enhancing security headers, adding clear contact and incident response information, improving accessibility, and conducting regular security audits to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching conciergegroup.eu

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on bespoke travel and concierge services. It targets a niche market of affluent travelers seeking personalized and luxury experiences. The business model is service-oriented, relying on high-touch client engagement rather than volume. The website branding is consistent and professional, supporting a premium market position. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies, indicating a small independent operation. The use of Webflow suggests a lean digital infrastructure. The absence of detailed business registration or VAT information limits deeper business intelligence. The company likely generates revenue through bespoke travel planning and concierge service fees. Partnerships or related domains were not identified, suggesting a focused standalone brand presence.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. The site uses HTTPS (implied by Webflow hosting and Google Tag Manager usage), but no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the provided content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which reduces readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security culture appears basic with opportunities for improvement in transparency, policy implementation, and technical security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate potential risks proactively.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Bespoke travel agency and concierge services
Key services
Bespoke travel agency services, Concierge services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by Webflow hosting and Google Tag Manager usage)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly listed on the homepage or in metadata
  4. Site uses Webflow CMS and hosting with Google Tag Manager for analytics
  5. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown but likely present due to Webflow hosting
  6. Content is professionally presented with clear branding and consistent design
  7. No explicit or adult content detected; content is safe for general audiences
  8. WHOIS data is unavailable due to EURid privacy restrictions for .eu domains
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging jQuery 3.5.1 and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The use of Webflow provides a modern CMS and hosting environment with built-in HTTPS support. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization but basic accessibility and SEO features. The site lacks advanced technical SEO tags and structured data such as JSON-LD. No server-side or backend technologies are visible from the provided data. The technical debt appears low due to the use of a managed platform, but reliance on third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager requires ongoing monitoring for security and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with conciergegroup.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review conciergegroup.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.