Skip to main content

Security report for comsi.nl

ComSi · Media · Netherlands

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ComSi is a small, creative advertising and web services agency based in Emmeloord, Netherlands, established in 2005. The company offers a range of services including website development, custom applications, logo design, and advertising materials, targeting local businesses seeking comprehensive advertising solutions. The website is built on WordPress with Elementor, demonstrating a modern and professional digital presence. Hosting is provided by Easyhosting B.V., a Dutch registrar, with DNSSEC enabled and HTTPS enforced, indicating good technical infrastructure. Security posture is solid with no critical vulnerabilities detected, but the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies and incident response information suggests room for improvement in compliance and transparency. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, with customer testimonials enhancing credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 23 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching comsi.nl

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ComSi positions itself as a local creative agency with a focus on both online and offline advertising solutions. Their business model revolves around providing end-to-end advertising services including design, development, printing, and hosting. The company leverages partnerships such as with 'gemaaktindenoordoostpolder.nl' to enhance its market reach. The target market includes small to medium enterprises in the Netherlands looking for creative and technical advertising services. The website content and testimonials indicate a customer-centric approach with emphasis on creativity and reliability. The company maintains a consistent brand image and uses modern web technologies to support its business operations.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and DNSSEC, enhancing domain and transport security. Use of hCaptcha plugin suggests an intent to mitigate spam, although the site key is empty, which may limit effectiveness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates limited transparency and preparedness in security governance. Tracking technologies like PostHog and Google Tag Manager are used, but privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is good technically but could benefit from improved policy disclosures and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  2. Implement a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Add explicit incident response and security contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ComSi
Description
ComSi is a creative advertising agency based in Emmeloord, Netherlands, offering online and offline advertising services including logo design, corporate identity, flyers, websites, and custom applications. They also provide printing and hosting services.
Key services
Websites, Custom applications, Logo design, Advertising materials, Billboard rental, Printing and hosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Elementor 3.29.2, PHP, jQuery, SVG animations, Google Tag Manager, PostHog analytics
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • Use of hCaptcha plugin (though site key empty)
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
PostHog, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
PostHog
Marketing tools
PostHog
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found
  3. Contact available only via contact form, no direct emails or phone numbers found
  4. Use of modern WordPress and Elementor technologies
  5. Active domain with DNSSEC and HTTPS
  6. Customer testimonials present indicating trust
  7. No visible security or incident response policies
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  9. Tracking via PostHog and Google Tag Manager present
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor page builder, supported by jQuery and SVG animations for enhanced user experience. Hosting is managed by Easyhosting B.V., a reputable Dutch provider, with DNSSEC enabled for domain security. Performance is moderate with some optimization possible. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Analytics are implemented via PostHog and Google Tag Manager, indicating a data-driven approach. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in accessibility and privacy compliance are recommended to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with comsi.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review comsi.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.