Skip to main content

Security report for computerbild.de

COMPUTER BILD · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

COMPUTER BILD is a leading German technology media portal offering extensive technology news, product tests, buying guides, and price comparisons. The website targets German-speaking technology consumers and enthusiasts, providing high-quality, regularly updated content. The business model relies on advertising, affiliate marketing, and subscription-based services such as newsletters and club memberships. The site is well-branded and maintains consistent professional design and content quality.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of computerbild.de. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
45/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 26 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching computerbild.de

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
45
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention computerbild.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
13,778
Employees
0
Customers
13,726
Third parties
52
Weak passwords
19%

24 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for computerbild.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The portal holds a strong market position in Germany's technology media sector, leveraging partnerships and affiliate programs to monetize content. Its audience includes tech-savvy consumers seeking reliable product information and deals. The website ecosystem includes related domains for marketing and coupons, enhancing user engagement and revenue streams. The business operates at a large scale with a focus on media and technology sectors.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, use of a consent management platform for GDPR compliance, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Security headers are partially detected, and the site benefits from CDN hosting via Akamai, improving resilience and performance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service pages prominently on the website.
  2. Add explicit security and incident response policies, including contact channels for reporting security issues.
  3. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Include verified company contact information such as emails and phone numbers to enhance credibility.
  5. Ensure all recommended security headers are implemented and regularly audited for compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
COMPUTER BILD
Description
Deutschlands großes Technikportal mit Tests, News, Kaufberatung und Preisvergleich zu den Bereichen PC & Hardware, Software, Telekommunikation und mehr.
Key services
Technology news, Product tests and reviews, Buying guides, Price comparison, Deals and discounts, Newsletter and club membership
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript ES6, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, CMP (Consent Management Platform), JSON-LD structured data, Font loading with WOFF2, Preconnect and DNS prefetch optimizations
Frameworks
Vue.js (inferred from data-v-* attributes)
Platforms
Desktop, Mobile (responsive design)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Consent management for GDPR compliance
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
asadcdn.com
Marketing tools
CMP (Consent Management Platform)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional German technology media portal.
  2. Content is rich, updated, and well-structured.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in HTML.
  4. Privacy policy and terms of service pages not directly found in provided HTML.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via CMP scripts.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. No explicit security or incident response contact information found.
  8. Website uses modern JavaScript frameworks and CDN hosting.
  9. Advertising and affiliate marketing are present but transparent.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern web technologies including Vue.js, Swiper.js for sliders, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. It employs a consent management platform to handle GDPR cookie consent. Hosting is via Akamai CDN, ensuring fast content delivery and scalability. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices with responsive design and preloading of fonts and scripts for performance. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with computerbild.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review computerbild.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.