Skip to main content

Security report for comperia.pl

Comperia.pl · Finance · Poland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Comperia.pl is a Polish financial comparison portal specializing in loans (cash, car, mortgage), deposits, and bank accounts. It serves Polish consumers seeking to compare and select optimal financial products from various banks. The website is well-established with a professional design and consistent branding, targeting the finance sector in Poland. The platform leverages multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools to optimize user experience and advertising effectiveness. Technically, the site uses HTTPS, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS and anonymized IP tracking, though some security headers are not explicitly detected in the provided data. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. No WHOIS data is publicly available, likely due to privacy protection, but the website content and linked domains suggest legitimacy. Overall, the site presents a low risk profile with good business credibility and technical implementation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching comperia.pl

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
20
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
100
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Comperia.pl operates in the competitive Polish financial services market as a comparison platform, providing value by aggregating loan and deposit offers. Its business model relies on affiliate marketing and advertising partnerships with banks and financial institutions. The platform targets individual consumers and possibly small businesses looking for transparent financial product comparisons. The presence of multiple subdomains for ads, forms, and content delivery indicates a complex ecosystem supporting marketing and user engagement. The lack of explicit contact information on the main site suggests a focus on automated online service rather than direct customer support. The company appears to maintain a strong market position with consistent branding and a comprehensive service offering. Growth potential lies in expanding product categories and enhancing user personalization through analytics.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms that comply with GDPR. Use of IP anonymization in Google Analytics and detailed cookie categorization reflects attention to privacy. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options in the provided data suggests room for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. The site uses reputable third-party services like Cloudflare, Google Analytics, and Hotjar, which provide additional layers of security and monitoring. Incident response and security policies are not publicly disclosed, which is a common gap but recommended to enhance trust. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by implementing additional HTTP security headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Consider adding clear contact information and support channels to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Comperia.pl
Description
Porównywarka finansowa ofert bankowych. Porównaj i wybierz najlepszy kredyt samochodowy lub kredyt hipoteczny. Sprawdź jaki bank zaoferuje najlepszy kredyt gotówkowy. Dowiedz się w którym banku otrzymasz atrakcyjne konto i wysoko oprocentowaną lokatę
Key services
Loan comparison (cash, car, mortgage), Deposit and bank account comparison
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Cookiebot, Cloudflare (likely for CDN and security), Roboto Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics (_gat._anonymizeIp)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge detected.
  2. WHOIS data is not publicly available, likely due to registry policies or privacy protection.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categorization.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page or in metadata.
  5. No terms of service page detected in the provided content.
  6. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel.
  7. Website content is in Polish and targets Polish financial consumers.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies found publicly.
  10. Website uses HTTPS and modern web fonts and scripts.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar for user behavior analytics, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. It loads Google Fonts (Roboto) for typography and appears to be hosted behind Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed by optimizing third-party scripts. No CMS was explicitly detected from the HTML content. The site uses multiple subdomains for advertising, forms, and content delivery, indicating a modular architecture. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online financial comparison service.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with comperia.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review comperia.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.