Skip to main content

Security report for companywall.me

CompanyWall Business · Finance · Montenegro

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CompanyWall Business is a Montenegro-based financial and business intelligence platform established in 2013, offering comprehensive credit and financial data services to a wide range of clients including SMEs, large enterprises, financial institutions, startups, and non-profits. The platform provides detailed credit reports, ownership transparency, bankruptcy data, and marketing databases, supporting informed business decisions and risk management. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery UI, FontAwesome, Google reCAPTCHA, and Keycloak SSO for authentication, ensuring a secure and user-friendly experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and bot protection, though some security headers could be improved. The WHOIS data is incomplete, which slightly reduces domain trustworthiness, but the website's professional content, clear contact information, and social media presence support its legitimacy. Overall, the site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides valuable services to its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching companywall.me

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position in Montenegro and the wider region with sister sites in multiple countries, indicating a regional expansion strategy. Its business model is subscription-based with tiered access packages catering to different customer needs. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its extensive database, real-time financial insights, and tailored marketing lists. The target customers range from micro to large enterprises, financial institutions, and professional service firms, reflecting a broad market approach. The presence of certifications and trust signals such as customer testimonials and transparent pricing enhances credibility. The company leverages partnerships and regional subsidiaries to extend its footprint and service offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS, reCAPTCHA v3 integration, and secure single sign-on via Keycloak. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of modern libraries and frameworks reduces the risk of known exploits, but continuous updates and security audits are recommended. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact is a gap in compliance and transparency. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business type but could be enhanced to meet higher standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options headers to strengthen security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Regularly update all third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS information to improve domain trustworthiness and legitimacy perception.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
CompanyWall Business
Registration number
5-0873703/2
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CompanyWall Business
Description
CompanyWall Business is a business platform providing financial analysis and credit information about companies, including credit reports, account blockages, bankruptcies, ownership structures, and other business data primarily for Montenegro.
Key services
Credit reports, Account blockages and history, Ownership transparency, Bankruptcy and insolvency data, Marketing databases, Business monitoring and alerts, Bonitetna ocjena (credit rating), Certificates of creditworthiness
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.3.1, jQuery UI 1.12.1, FontAwesome 5, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Owl Carousel, Keycloak SSO
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection
  • Secure login with Keycloak SSO
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or malformed, limiting domain trust verification.
  3. Website uses modern frontend technologies and security measures like HTTPS and reCAPTCHA.
  4. Clear business focus on financial and credit information services in Montenegro and region.
  5. Multiple subscription packages and detailed service descriptions enhance user clarity.
  6. Contact information is prominently displayed with multiple channels.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn supports business credibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern frontend stack using Bootstrap 4.3.1, jQuery UI, FontAwesome 5, and Owl Carousel for UI components and responsiveness. Google reCAPTCHA v3 is used for bot mitigation, and Keycloak SSO manages authentication, indicating a robust identity management approach. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and layouts. Performance is moderate, with external dependencies on CDNs for CSS and JS libraries. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with companywall.me. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review companywall.me.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.