Skip to main content

Security report for compagnie-leanature.com

Compagnie Léa Nature · Retail · France

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Compagnie Léa Nature is a prominent French manufacturer specializing in organic and natural products across food, health, beauty, and home care sectors. Established in 1993, the company operates as a collective of family-owned businesses united by a commitment to bio-responsibility and sustainability. Their market position is strong as the leading French manufacturer in their niche, supported by a diverse portfolio of brands and active philanthropic engagement in environmental and social causes. The website reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence, optimized for performance, accessibility, and SEO, leveraging WordPress and modern web technologies. Security measures include HTTPS, GDPR-compliant cookie management, and anti-bot protections, although some security headers could be enhanced. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature security posture and compliance with privacy regulations, supporting the company's credibility and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching compagnie-leanature.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company’s business model centers on manufacturing and distributing organic and natural products through multiple subsidiary brands, targeting consumers interested in health and sustainability. Their philanthropic initiatives and environmental commitments enhance brand reputation and stakeholder trust. The website's multilingual support and e-commerce linkage indicate a broad market reach. The domain age is relatively recent compared to the founding year, suggesting a dedicated web presence for this business unit or brand. The company maintains partnerships and subsidiaries across various domains, reinforcing its market ecosystem. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests a preference for controlled communication via contact forms.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. GDPR compliance is evident through a cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy. The presence of Wordfence scripts implies active security monitoring. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and some common security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly detected, representing areas for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. Incident response and security policy documents are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and WordPress core to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Compagnie Léa Nature
Description
Compagnie Léa Nature est un village d’entreprises familiales unies et engagées pour une bio responsable. Depuis 1993, elle développe des produits naturels, majoritairement bio, bénéfiques pour la santé et respectueux de l’environnement. Elle est le premier fabricant français de produits bio et naturels avec une offre globale en alimentation, santé, beauté-hygiène et soin de la maison.
Key services
Manufacturing of organic food products, Manufacturing of natural health and beauty products, Philanthropy in environmental and social causes
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, WP Rocket (performance optimization), GDPR Cookie Compliance plugin, SitePress Multilingual CMS (WPML), jQuery
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism with GDPR compliance
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Wordfence security plugin (implied by Wordfence script)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong focus on organic and natural product manufacturing and philanthropy.
  3. Comprehensive GDPR and cookie compliance mechanisms implemented.
  4. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security vulnerabilities detected.
  5. Multiple brands and subsidiaries are clearly presented.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  8. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content; contact is via form.
  9. No terms of service page detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, WP Rocket for performance, and GDPR Cookie Compliance for privacy management. It uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with structured data implemented via JSON-LD for SEO benefits. Performance optimizations such as lazy loading and preloading are in place. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a fast, secure, and user-friendly experience with room for incremental security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with compagnie-leanature.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review compagnie-leanature.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.