Skip to main content

Security report for comac-medical.com

Comac Medical · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Comac Medical is a well-established global Contract Research Organization (CRO) and Site Management Organization (SMO) specializing in clinical trials from Phase I to IV, including medical devices and supplements. The company positions itself as a reliable full-service provider with extensive experience and a broad geographic coverage. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and client partnerships. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools with GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled and bot protection via Google reCAPTCHA, though some security headers could be improved. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Overall, the website and domain registration data indicate a trustworthy and credible business presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching comac-medical.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets pharmaceutical and medical device sectors, offering comprehensive clinical research services including CRO and SMO solutions. Their market position is strong in Central and Eastern Europe with global expansion. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on clinical trial management and site support. The presence of major biopharma client logos and a long domain age support their credibility. The website content is professionally crafted to appeal to sponsors and partners in the clinical research industry. The company leverages digital marketing and analytics tools to optimize outreach and user engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent aligned with GDPR and CCPA. Use of Google reCAPTCHA protects against spam and bots. However, explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not evident, representing an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data leaks were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business type but could be enhanced to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Comac Medical
Description
Comac Medical is a global full-service Contract Research Organization (CRO) and Site Management Organisation (SMO) specializing in Phase I to IV clinical trials and investigations for medical devices and supplements. They offer comprehensive in-house clinical trial solutions and have experience in various therapeutic areas.
Key services
CRO Services, SMO Services, Early Phase Clinical Research Unit, Functional Service Provider (FSP)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Google Fonts, Adobe Typekit, jQuery, Flickity, Fancybox, Select2, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Microsoft Clarity
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner with GDPR and CCPA compliance
  • Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Microsoft Advertising (bing.com)
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms implemented.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service URLs found in main navigation but cookie policy is present.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content provided.
  5. Social media presence confirmed via LinkedIn link.
  6. Multiple third-party analytics and advertising scripts used with consent.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  9. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework, leveraging modern front-end libraries such as Flickity for sliders and Fancybox for modals. It uses Google Fonts and Adobe Typekit for typography. Analytics and marketing are managed via Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Bing advertising cookies. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Performance is moderate, with some optimization possible. Hosting provider details are not explicit but domain registrar is PublicDomainRegistry.com. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional web presence suitable for the clinical research industry.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with comac-medical.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review comac-medical.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.