Skip to main content

Security report for collectrenaissance.com

Marriott International, Inc. · Hospitality · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and DNS health.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CollectRenaissance.com is an official e-commerce platform offering luxury bedding, pillows, linens, robes, and home decor inspired by Renaissance Hotels, a Marriott International brand. The website targets consumers seeking premium hotel-quality home products and operates as part of a large hospitality and retail ecosystem. The site demonstrates a mature digital presence with multiple marketing and analytics integrations, including Adobe Launch, Google Tag Manager, and OneTrust for privacy compliance. The technical infrastructure is hosted on AWS with modern TLS protocols and a valid SSL certificate, though performance is impacted by a large page size and resource count. Security posture is strong with strict DMARC policies and no major SSL vulnerabilities, but a subdomain takeover risk exists on the staging subdomain. Privacy compliance is robust with clear cookie consent mechanisms and comprehensive privacy policies. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve performance and address the subdomain vulnerability.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Potential Subdomain Takeover

      Subdomain staging.collectrenaissance.com points to unregistered service dkfwj1ywywpas.cloudfront.net

      What to do: Remove or fix CNAME record to prevent subdomain takeover

      • WSTG-CONF-10
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching collectrenaissance.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
97
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality and retail sectors, leveraging Marriott International's brand equity to sell luxury home products online. The business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce with a focus on branded merchandise. The site is part of a broader network of hotel brand stores, indicating a strong partnership ecosystem. The presence of multiple marketing and tracking tools suggests a data-driven approach to customer engagement. The company targets upscale consumers valuing quality and brand association. Growth potential is supported by Marriott's global presence and cross-promotion with sister hotel brand stores. The business maintains professional content and consistent branding, reinforcing market position as a premium retailer.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, valid SSL certificates supporting TLS 1.3 and 1.2, and strict email authentication via SPF and DMARC with reject policies. OCSP stapling is enabled, enhancing certificate validation performance. However, the staging subdomain is vulnerable to subdomain takeover due to an unclaimed Cloudfront distribution, posing a risk of malicious content injection. No other critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The site lacks some advanced security headers like HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, and X-Frame-Options, which could further harden security. Privacy compliance is strong with OneTrust cookie consent and GDPR-aligned policies. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly disclosed, which is a minor gap in transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Mitigate the subdomain takeover vulnerability by claiming or removing the staging.collectrenaissance.com DNS entry.
  2. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS and prevent downgrade attacks.
  3. Implement additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  4. Optimize website performance by reducing page size and resource count to improve load times and user experience.
  5. Enhance accessibility compliance to improve usability for all users and meet regulatory standards.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern Vue.js-based frontend framework (Quasar) with extensive use of JavaScript and CSS resources, resulting in a large page size and slow load times. Hosting is on AWS with multiple IP addresses and DNS managed by hotelsathome.com nameservers. The site integrates numerous third-party marketing and analytics tools, including Adobe Launch, Google Tag Manager, Pinterest, Snapchat, LinkedIn, Bing Ads, and Sojern, indicating a complex tracking ecosystem. Privacy and cookie consent are managed via OneTrust, providing a comprehensive user consent mechanism. The SSL configuration is good with TLS 1.3 support and OCSP stapling, but lacks HSTS. DNS records include valid SPF and DMARC with reject policies, enhancing email security. The staging subdomain points to an unclaimed Cloudfront distribution, representing a security risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with collectrenaissance.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review collectrenaissance.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.