Skip to main content

Security report for colgateoralhealthnetwork.com

Colgate Oral Health Network · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, DNS health and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Colgate Oral Health Network website serves as a professional platform providing educational content and resources focused on oral health, targeting dental professionals and practitioners. The site is branded consistently with the Colgate-Palmolive Company, indicating a strong market position in healthcare education. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern libraries such as Bootstrap and uses Google Tag Manager and Matomo for analytics, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks advanced security headers and formal vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, which could expose the organization to regulatory risks. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy in content but requires improvements in privacy and security transparency to enhance compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 15 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching colgateoralhealthnetwork.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
85
Email security
75
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention colgateoralhealthnetwork.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,178
Employees
0
Customers
1,178
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
12%

6 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for colgateoralhealthnetwork.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as an educational content platform within the healthcare sector, specifically oral health. It leverages the strong brand equity of Colgate-Palmolive to reach dental professionals globally. The business model focuses on content delivery and professional development resources. The absence of direct contact information and privacy policies suggests a possible reliance on parent company infrastructure for customer relations and compliance. The use of multiple analytics tools indicates an interest in user engagement metrics, though privacy transparency is lacking. The site’s partnership with Dental Tribune Media Group for hosting and CDN services suggests a strategic alliance to optimize content delivery. Growth potential lies in expanding interactive features and compliance adherence to meet evolving regulatory standards.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces protection against common web attacks. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found in the provided content. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency and incident response readiness. Privacy compliance gaps, especially regarding GDPR, are notable due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The site would benefit from enhanced security controls, regular audits of third-party scripts, and formalized incident response procedures to strengthen its security culture and reduce risk exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and publish a security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response.
  4. Audit and monitor third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize security risks.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Colgate Oral Health Network
Description
A professional dental health network providing educational content and resources related to oral health.
Key services
Educational articles, Clinical resources, Professional development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, Bootstrap, Select2, DataTables, jQuery
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and content is professional and healthcare-focused.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies were detected in the provided HTML content.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers were found in the visible content.
  4. Use of multiple analytics and tracking scripts without visible privacy compliance mechanisms.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual for a corporate website.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and libraries.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing Bootstrap for responsive design and several JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Select2, and DataTables for enhanced UI functionality. Analytics are managed via Google Tag Manager and Matomo, indicating a layered approach to data collection. Hosting is supported by Dental Tribune Media Group’s CDN infrastructure, which likely improves content delivery speed and reliability. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, particularly in accessibility and SEO enhancements. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from updated security practices and improved privacy compliance mechanisms. There is no indication of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided content, but continuous monitoring is recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with colgateoralhealthnetwork.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review colgateoralhealthnetwork.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.