Skip to main content

Security report for coincover.com

CoinCover · Finance · N/a

High risk. 15 critical or high findings in Network security, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CoinCover is a specialized crypto security company providing digital asset protection services primarily for institutions and their customers. Their offerings include wallet disaster recovery, fraud prevention, and real-time transaction monitoring, positioning them as a trusted player in the crypto security market. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with modern technologies, strong branding, and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, reflecting a commitment to compliance and user trust. Security posture is robust, with HTTPS, security headers, and ISO 27001 certification, although explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly available. The absence of WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty regarding domain registration legitimacy, but the overall business credibility remains high based on content and certifications.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

15 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Telnet

      Port 23 (Telnet) is publicly accessible - Telnet - Unencrypted remote access

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Telnet using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MSSQL

      Port 1433 (MSSQL) is publicly accessible - MSSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MSSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Oracle

      Port 1521 (Oracle) is publicly accessible - Oracle - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Oracle using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching coincover.com

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
90
Email security
77
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
83
Average
64
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CoinCover targets both institutional clients and individual crypto asset holders, operating a B2B and B2C hybrid model. The company has secured over 550 businesses and protects millions of wallets, indicating significant market penetration. Their partnership ecosystem includes reputable crypto firms and technology providers, enhancing their market position. The business model focuses on risk mitigation in the crypto space, a growing and critical sector. The website content and client logos reinforce their credibility and industry relevance. Growth indicators include active blog content, knowledge hubs, and developer resources, suggesting ongoing investment in thought leadership and ecosystem engagement.

Security posture

The website employs strong security measures including HTTPS, multiple security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms. The presence of ISO 27001 certification indicates adherence to international security standards. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a public incident response contact or vulnerability disclosure policy is a gap that could impact rapid response to security issues. Overall, the security maturity is high, but transparency in incident handling could be improved to enhance trust and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated incident response page with clear contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance WHOIS transparency if possible to improve domain registration trustworthiness.
  5. Continue to maintain and communicate compliance with data protection regulations to strengthen privacy posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CoinCover
Description
We protect digital assets for institutions and their customers. From fraud prevention to wallet recovery, our crypto security solutions protect your digital assets with confidence.
Key services
Wallet disaster recovery, Fraud prevention, Real-time transaction monitoring, Wallet access restoration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Lottie animations, Slick Carousel, Swiper.js
Frameworks
HubSpot CMS
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security frameworks and certifications

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong focus on crypto asset security for institutions and individuals
  3. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  4. Presence of comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact via form and social media
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, which is a potential red flag but mitigated by other trust signals
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the HubSpot CMS platform, leveraging modern front-end libraries such as Slick Carousel and Swiper.js for interactive elements, and Lottie for animations. Analytics and marketing integrations include Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts and rich media content. Technical debt appears low, with clean HTML structure and consistent branding. Hosting is likely managed by HubSpot, providing reliable infrastructure. Opportunities exist to streamline third-party dependencies and enhance incident response capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with coincover.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review coincover.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.