Skip to main content

Security report for coffee-apart.com

Kaučīno apart · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kaučīno apart is a small hospitality business offering guest house apartments in Jūrmala, Latvia. The website presents basic information about the apartments available and contact phone number and address. The business operates a simple WordPress.com hosted site with limited content and no advanced business or security disclosures. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with Jetpack and Gutenberg, hosted by Automattic Inc., providing a stable and secure platform with HTTPS enabled. However, the site lacks privacy and cookie policies, incident response information, and email contact details, which limits its compliance and trustworthiness. Security posture is adequate for a small site but could be improved with additional headers and policies. Overall, the site is functional but basic, with room for enhancements in privacy, security, and business transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching coffee-apart.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets travelers seeking apartment accommodation in Jūrmala, offering several apartment types. It operates a straightforward hospitality rental model with no visible e-commerce or booking integration on the site. The market position is local and small scale, with no evident partnerships or certifications. The site content and navigation are basic, reflecting a small business digital presence. The lack of social media and email contact limits customer engagement channels. Hosting on WordPress.com ensures reliable uptime and platform security but restricts customization. The business could benefit from expanding online presence and adding trust signals to improve market competitiveness.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS and domain transfer protection, indicating basic security hygiene. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, and DNSSEC is not enabled, which could be improved. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor contact channels for reporting security issues. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but lacks comprehensive policies and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Add a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers (CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including email addresses for general and security incident reporting.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins and monitor for vulnerabilities to maintain security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kaučīno apart
Description
Guest house with apartments located in Jūrmala offering various apartments such as Royal, Kapučīno, X.O., Loft, Studio, and Dzintaru apartments.
Key services
Apartment rentals, Guest house accommodation
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Jetpack, Gutenberg, Twemoji
Frameworks
Gutenberg
Platforms
WordPress.com
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
WordPress.com Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
WordPress.com Stats
Marketing tools
Jetpack
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress.com hosted guest house site with basic content and navigation
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. Contact information limited to phone number and physical address
  4. No security or incident response policies disclosed
  5. No business certifications or trust badges present
  6. No email contact found in the content
  7. No social media links detected
  8. Website uses HTTPS and is hosted by Automattic Inc.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using Gutenberg blocks and Jetpack plugin, hosted on WordPress.com by Automattic Inc. The site uses modern web fonts and emoji support via Twemoji. Performance is moderate with responsive design and basic accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta description and Open Graph tags present but no structured JSON-LD data. The site lacks advanced technical SEO and accessibility optimizations. No custom scripts or third-party analytics beyond WordPress.com Stats are detected. The technical stack is stable but basic, suitable for a small hospitality business but with opportunities for modernization and enhancement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with coffee-apart.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review coffee-apart.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.