Skip to main content

Security report for codemill.se

Codemill · Media · Sweden

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Codemill is a Swedish-based company specializing in empowering media teams with software and digital services tailored for broadcast, VOD/OTT, content supply chain, and media asset management workflows. The company positions itself as a trusted partner to leading global media organizations, offering products such as Accurate.Video, Accurate Player SDK, Cantemo MAM, and bespoke digital services. Their market presence is supported by a strong client portfolio and industry certifications. Technically, the website is built on Webflow CMS, leveraging modern analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, HubSpot, and LinkedIn Insight. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility could be improved. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, employs security headers, and integrates a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are absent, representing areas for enhancement. Overall, Codemill's digital presence reflects a mature and professional organization with a solid security posture and privacy compliance, suitable for its industry and clientele.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
63/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching codemill.se

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
63
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Codemill operates in the media technology sector, targeting media companies requiring scalable and efficient media workflow solutions. Their business model is B2B, focusing on software products and custom digital services. The company leverages partnerships and certifications to build trust and expand market reach. Their client base includes major media and entertainment companies, indicating strong market positioning. The website content and structure support lead generation through contact forms and newsletter subscriptions. Marketing efforts utilize multiple tracking and analytics platforms to optimize engagement. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a controlled communication channel strategy, likely to manage inquiries efficiently. Codemill's strategic focus on media workflows and cloud journey challenges positions it well for continued growth in a digital-first media landscape.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforcement and multiple security headers enhancing protection against common web vulnerabilities. The integration of a cookie consent banner with opt-in capabilities aligns with GDPR requirements, reflecting attention to privacy compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a dedicated security policy page, incident response contact information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. The use of third-party scripts and analytics tools necessitates ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, Codemill exhibits a good security posture appropriate for its business context but should consider formalizing security policies and incident response details to strengthen trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet recognized standards (e.g., WCAG).
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Codemill
Description
Codemill empowers media teams to entertain and inform the world. They provide solutions for broadcast, VOD/OTT, Content Supply Chain and Media Asset Management workflows.
Key services
Accurate.Video product suite, Accurate Player SDK, Cantemo MAM, Bespoke Digital Services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, HubSpot, Webflow, Finsweet Cookie Consent, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Factors AI, Albacross, CookieHub
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, Albacross
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics, Albacross
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Finsweet Cookie Consent, Factors AI
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content rich.
  2. Strong focus on media industry solutions and client trust.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented.
  4. Multiple trusted client logos and industry certifications displayed.
  5. No signs of blocking or WAF interference detected.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found.
  8. Contact information primarily via forms; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern web fonts, responsive design, and JavaScript libraries for enhanced user experience. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, HubSpot, LinkedIn Insight, and Factors AI, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Performance is moderate, with CDN hosting via Webflow ensuring reliable content delivery. The site includes cookie consent management compliant with GDPR, enhancing privacy controls. Some technical debt is noted in repeated Google Analytics script inclusions and minor accessibility gaps. The site architecture supports clear navigation and content relevance, though terms of service and explicit security documentation are missing. Overall, the technical implementation supports business goals effectively with opportunities for optimization in accessibility and documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with codemill.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review codemill.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.