Skip to main content

Security report for cockcompetition.com

Whale Member Ltd. · Media · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CockCompetition.com is an adult entertainment website specializing in explicit content featuring large black male genitalia. It operates as part of the PornPros.com network, offering subscription-based access to 24 adult sites with daily HD video updates. The business targets adults seeking niche adult content and leverages a networked business model to provide bundled memberships and partner discounts. Technically, the site uses modern front-end technologies such as Bootstrap and jQuery, hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, no CMS or advanced SEO features are detected. Security posture is moderate with some best practices like age verification and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC, security headers, and has potentially risky third-party scripts. Privacy compliance is basic with privacy and terms pages present but no explicit cookie policy and limited GDPR indicators. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve security and privacy practices to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cockcompetition.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
58
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site holds a niche position within the adult entertainment industry, leveraging the PornPros.com network's brand and infrastructure. Its subscription model and bundled access to multiple sites provide competitive advantages. Revenue streams include memberships and partner discounts, supported by multiple third-party billing agents. The target audience is adults seeking explicit niche content. The company is established since 2007 with physical presence in the UK and US. Partnerships with billing providers and network sites indicate a mature operational ecosystem. However, lack of direct contact information and limited transparency on security and privacy policies may impact user trust.

Security posture

Security maturity is moderate. The site enforces age verification and uses clientTransferProhibited domain status, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are important for domain and web security. External scripts from domains with explicit names pose potential privacy and security risks. No incident response or security policy information is provided. Privacy compliance is basic with no cookie policy page and limited GDPR indicators. The site should improve SSL/TLS configuration, implement security headers, and review third-party scripts to reduce risk. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Conduct a security review of all third-party scripts and remove or replace those from suspicious domains.
  4. Develop and publish a comprehensive cookie policy and enhance GDPR compliance measures.
  5. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Whale Member Ltd.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Whale Member Ltd.
Description
CockCompetition.com is an adult entertainment website featuring explicit content focused on large black male genitalia. It is part of the PornPros.com network offering access to 24 adult sites with daily updates and HD videos.
Key services
Adult video streaming, Membership access to multiple adult sites, Discounts to partner sites
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Analytics, ga-lite, Custom JavaScript
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • Age verification disclaimer with cookie consent
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, ga-lite
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
FuckYouCash
Tracking pixels
ga-lite
Marketing tools
ga-lite
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult entertainment site with explicit content and age verification.
  2. Part of a larger adult network (PornPros.com).
  3. Uses multiple third-party billing and support services.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers; only physical addresses provided.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  7. External scripts loaded from domains with explicit names may pose privacy/security concerns.
  8. Basic privacy and terms pages exist but lack advanced GDPR compliance indicators.
  9. No cookie policy page found, but age disclaimer uses cookie consent mechanism.
  10. Website uses modern front-end technologies but no CMS detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Bootstrap and jQuery, supported by Google Analytics and ga-lite for tracking. Hosting is via Amazon AWS DNS infrastructure, indicating reliable hosting. The site is mobile optimized and has a clear navigation structure. However, no CMS is detected, which may limit content management flexibility. Performance is moderate with room for improvement. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal. The use of external scripts from domains with explicit or suspicious names introduces technical risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cockcompetition.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cockcompetition.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.