Skip to main content

Security report for cobo.com

Cobo · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cobo is a digital asset custody and wallet infrastructure provider offering a comprehensive platform that integrates four wallet technologies: Custodial, MPC, Smart Contract, and Exchange Wallets. The company targets institutional clients such as exchanges, funds, fintechs, and brokerages, providing secure, scalable, and compliant wallet solutions with multi-chain support. Their platform emphasizes security with hardware-based isolation, trusted execution environments, and advanced risk controls. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with modern technologies, strong branding, and extensive customer testimonials from reputable clients like Deribit and BitMart. Security certifications such as SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 reinforce their trustworthiness. However, the absence of publicly available WHOIS data for the domain www.cobo.com introduces some uncertainty about domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 23 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cobo.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
82
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cobo positions itself as a leading provider in the digital asset custody space, leveraging a B2B SaaS model focused on wallet infrastructure. Their broad multi-chain and token support, combined with compliance integrations (Chainalysis, Elliptic), provide competitive advantages. The company has established partnerships and licenses in multiple jurisdictions, enhancing market credibility. Customer testimonials and awards indicate strong market acceptance and growth. The business model relies on institutional clients requiring secure and compliant custody solutions, with revenue likely from subscription and service fees. The company’s ecosystem includes developer tools and APIs, facilitating integration and scalability.

Security posture

The website and platform exhibit a strong security posture with HTTPS enforcement, multiple security headers, and advanced wallet security architectures including HSMs and Intel SGX. Regular audits and penetration testing by top-tier firms are claimed, alongside 24/7 monitoring and incident readiness. However, explicit incident response policies and security contact channels are not publicly disclosed, which could be improved. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. Compliance with ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II standards further supports a robust security framework.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy page with clear contact information.
  2. Provide direct security contact emails such as security@cobo.com to facilitate responsible disclosure.
  3. Enhance transparency by publishing recent security audit summaries or certifications.
  4. Consider adding verified company phone numbers and physical addresses to improve business credibility.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain GDPR and global compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cobo
Description
Cobo provides a digital asset wallet platform offering four wallet technologies: Custodial, MPC, Smart Contract, and Exchange Wallets. It offers advanced risk controls, developer tools, and multi-chain support to empower blockchain innovations.
Key services
Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS), Custodial Wallets, MPC Wallets, Smart Contract Wallets, Exchange Wallets, AML/KYT compliance integration, Multi-chain token support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Storyblok CMS, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Tag Manager, Leadfeeder, Intercom
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with email input validation
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of hardware security modules (HSMs) and Intel SGX for wallet security
  • Distributed TSS nodes inside Trusted Execution Environments

Analytics and tracking

Services
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Leadfeeder
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Leadfeeder
Marketing tools
Intercom
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong emphasis on security certifications and compliance
  3. Multiple customer testimonials from reputable companies
  4. Comprehensive product and service descriptions
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content
  7. No phone numbers explicitly listed
  8. Contact primarily via email and web forms
  9. WHOIS data missing or unavailable for www.cobo.com
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern Next.js framework with React, leveraging Storyblok CMS for content management. It uses various analytics and marketing tools including LinkedIn Insight Tag, Leadfeeder, and Intercom for user engagement and tracking. The site is well optimized for mobile devices and demonstrates fast loading performance. SEO best practices are followed with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). No technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cobo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cobo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.