Skip to main content

Security report for co2neutralwebsite.fi

IngenCO2.dk · Energy · Denmark

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CO2 Neutral Website is a service operated by IngenCO2.dk, focused on enabling website owners to make their websites carbon neutral by offsetting their carbon emissions through membership fees. The company funds global renewable energy projects certified by the Gold Standard, enhancing sustainable branding for its clients. The website is well-positioned in the niche market of environmental sustainability and digital carbon offsetting, targeting businesses and website owners who want to demonstrate environmental responsibility. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Next.js and React, with integrations for analytics and security such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and reCAPTCHA v3. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, providing a good user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, although there is room for improvement in privacy compliance and incident response transparency. Overall, the domain registration is consistent with the business claims, enhancing trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching co2neutralwebsite.fi

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
45
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates on a membership model where clients pay a fixed fee to offset their website's carbon footprint. This model supports global renewable energy projects, providing a visible certification and branding advantage to members. The company leverages reputable certifications and annual audits to build trust. The presence of multiple client logos and references indicates a growing customer base and market acceptance. The business targets environmentally conscious companies seeking to improve their CSR profile and digital sustainability. Partnerships with recognized certification bodies and auditors strengthen the company's market position. The business appears small but focused, with potential for growth in the sustainability sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of security headers, and integration of reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information represents a compliance gap. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a privacy and cookie policy, but lacks an explicit cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business type but could be enhanced by formalizing incident response and improving user privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement an explicit cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and incident response procedures.
  3. Add clear contact channels for security incidents, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with accessibility standards.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
IngenCO2.dk
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IngenCO2.dk
Description
Paranna brändiäsi CO2 Neutraalin Webbisivun sertifikaatin avulla. Kun tuet globaaleja hankkeitamme hiilipäästöjen vähentämiseksi, kompensoit myös oman verkkosivustosi hiilijalanjäljen. Yhdessä toimimalla voimme vaikuttaa.
Key services
Carbon offsetting for website emissions, Certification and branding with CO2 neutral badge, Funding global Gold Standard renewable energy projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA v3 for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides clear information about carbon neutral certification for websites.
  2. Strong emphasis on sustainability and global renewable energy projects.
  3. Use of reputable third-party certifications (Gold Standard) and audits (BDO).
  4. Multiple client logos and references enhance trust.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  6. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected despite cookie policy presence.
  7. Contact information is clear and professional.
  8. Modern web technologies and frameworks used.
  9. Good SEO and mobile optimization observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js and React, indicating a modern and scalable frontend architecture. It uses Sanity.io as a headless CMS for content management, enabling flexible content updates. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing tracking, while Google reCAPTCHA v3 protects forms from spam. The site loads asynchronously scripts and uses responsive design techniques for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed by optimizing images and scripts. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The technical stack is appropriate for the business needs, with opportunities to enhance accessibility and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with co2neutralwebsite.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review co2neutralwebsite.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.