Skip to main content

Security report for co-pay.com

co-pay · Healthcare · United States

Partial score · DNS & email only

72/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

co-pay.com is a healthcare-focused platform powered by Doceree, Inc., offering the largest database of co-pay and affordability programs for prescription medications. The platform integrates with over 150 electronic health records (EHRs) and health systems, enabling physicians to provide real-time, patient-specific savings during the prescribing process. The business model centers on providing free co-pay discount coupons to patients, enhancing medication affordability without subscriptions or hidden fees. The website targets patients seeking medication savings and healthcare providers aiming to improve patient affordability. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, hosted on AWS infrastructure. It employs multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, indicating a mature digital marketing and analytics strategy. The site is mobile-optimized with good performance and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks explicit security headers and a dedicated security policy or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is strong with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, though no active cookie consent mechanism is present. WHOIS data confirms the domain's legitimacy with a long registration history and consistent business information. Overall, co-pay.com presents a professional, trustworthy, and user-friendly platform with a solid business foundation and good technical implementation. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and cookie consent would enhance its security posture and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching co-pay.com

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
72

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

co-pay.com holds a strong market position as the largest database of co-pay and affordability programs integrated into healthcare workflows. Its competitive advantage lies in AI-powered real-time benefit checks and seamless integration with numerous EHRs, enabling personalized patient savings. The business model is B2B2C, serving healthcare providers and patients. Revenue streams likely include partnerships with pharmaceutical manufacturers and healthcare providers. The target customers are patients needing affordable medications and healthcare professionals seeking to optimize prescribing affordability. Growth indicators include extensive EHR integration and active marketing via social media and analytics tools. The partnership ecosystem includes its parent company Doceree, Inc., and possibly pharmaceutical manufacturers. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding integrations and enhancing privacy and security transparency to maintain trust and compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced with good SSL configuration, and no sensitive data leakage was observed. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact information, which is a compliance gap. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which could pose regulatory risks. No vulnerabilities or malicious indicators were detected in the content. The security culture appears focused on compliance and user trust but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and provide clear incident response contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Doceree, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
co-pay
Description
A Doceree initiative to build the largest database of co-pay and affordability programs. Integrated seamlessly into physician workflows across 150+ EHRs and health systems, the AI-powered solution enables delivery of real-time, patient-specific affordability messages to HCPs during the prescribing moment. Powered by Doceree’s patented Triggers™ technology and real-time benefit checks (RTBC), physicians can now instantly access and share co-pay offers across multiple patient touchpoints.
Key services
Co-pay discount coupons, Medication savings, Real-time benefit checks, Physician workflow integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, AWS DNS, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with required fields

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM), LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides a clear value proposition for prescription savings.
  2. Content is professionally presented with consistent branding.
  3. Multiple privacy and legal policies are present and accessible.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. No cookie consent mechanism despite cookie policy presence.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js framework, leveraging server-side rendering for performance and SEO benefits. Hosting is on AWS, indicated by DNS nameservers. The site uses multiple analytics and marketing scripts including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, reflecting a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Performance is fast with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site lacks a traditional CMS, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of DNSSEC. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust and scalable but could improve security hardening and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with co-pay.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review co-pay.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.