Skip to main content

Security report for ptfi.co.id

PT Freeport Indonesia · Energy · Indonesia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PT Freeport Indonesia is a major mining company operating in Papua, Indonesia, specializing in copper, gold, and silver extraction and processing. The company maintains a strong market position with global concentrate marketing and emphasizes sustainability, community engagement, and corporate governance. The website reflects a professional digital presence with good content quality and navigation, supporting both Indonesian and English languages. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and secure forms, though lacks some advanced security headers and explicit incident response information. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and credible but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ptfi.co.id

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
95
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ptfi.co.id, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ptfi.co.id.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets a broad audience including local communities, investors, and potential employees. Its business model focuses on mining operations and sustainable development, supported by partnerships such as MIND ID and its parent company Freeport-McMoRan. The website content highlights social responsibility, environmental policies, and career opportunities, indicating a mature and socially responsible enterprise. The presence of ICMM and GRI certifications further strengthens its market credibility. The company operates at a large scale within the energy sector in Indonesia.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure forms, with no visible exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. However, it lacks explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and does not provide public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking without visible cookie consent, which may pose privacy compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by adding privacy policies, cookie consent, and security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to inform users about tracking.
  3. Add a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve incident response transparency.
  4. Enhance security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PT Freeport Indonesia
Description
PT Freeport Indonesia is a leading mining company conducting exploration, mining, and processing of copper, gold, and silver ores in the highlands of Mimika Regency, Papua Province, Indonesia. They market concentrates containing copper, gold, and silver worldwide.
Key services
Mining operations, Ore processing, Sustainable community and environmental programs, Corporate social responsibility initiatives
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Slick Carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed credentials
  • Secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and multilingual support (Indonesian and English).
  2. Strong focus on sustainability, corporate governance, and community engagement.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is primarily via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers explicitly listed.
  5. Use of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  7. Social media presence is active and linked in footer.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking; full content accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery and Slick Carousel for UI components. It loads resources over HTTPS and integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement in loading speed and accessibility. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ptfi.co.id. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ptfi.co.id.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.