Skip to main content

Security report for cloudnine.lv

Hospitality · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cloud Nine is a hospitality-focused website promoting signature cocktails with a twist. The site is built using the Framer platform, indicating a modern but basic technical infrastructure. The content is minimal, targeting a mature audience interested in cocktail experiences. The website lacks comprehensive business information, contact details, and privacy or security policies, which limits its credibility and trustworthiness. Technically, the site uses modern web fonts and assets but does not implement advanced security headers or privacy compliance mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site presents a basic digital presence with room for significant improvements in security, privacy, and business transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cloudnine.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cloudnine.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for cloudnine.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website appears to represent a small hospitality business specializing in signature cocktails. Its market positioning is unclear due to limited content and lack of business details. The business model likely revolves around direct customer engagement at a physical location or online shop, though no e-commerce functionality or contact forms are evident. The absence of social media links and certifications suggests a nascent or low-profile operation. Growth indicators and partnerships are not visible, limiting strategic insights. The site’s reliance on Framer suggests a focus on design aesthetics over complex backend functionality.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The lack of contact information further complicates security incident handling. The site does not appear to collect user data via forms, reducing some risk, but overall security maturity is low. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is not demonstrated.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms.
  3. Include clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incidents.
  4. Deploy security headers to protect against common web vulnerabilities.
  5. Establish an incident response plan and publish vulnerability disclosure guidelines.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Signature cocktails with a twist
Key services
Signature cocktails
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Framer
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Services
framer.com events
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
framer.com events script
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is built with Framer, indicating a modern but basic tech stack.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the content.
  5. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  6. Site content is minimal and focused on signature cocktails, targeting mature audiences.
  7. No forms detected on the site for data collection.
  8. External domains are limited to Framer assets and fonts.
  9. No social media links or business certifications found.
  10. No evidence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Framer platform, utilizing its proprietary framework and hosting. It uses modern web fonts and asynchronous event tracking scripts from Framer. The site’s performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal, with basic meta tags and Open Graph data present. No CMS beyond Framer is detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The site lacks advanced technical features such as structured data beyond Open Graph or JSON-LD. There is no evidence of technical debt but also limited technical sophistication.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cloudnine.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cloudnine.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.