Empath Labs Inc. · Healthcare · United States
Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.
Clinical Companions is a healthcare-focused SaaS solution developed by Empath Labs Inc., designed to improve retention and engagement in pediatric clinical trials. The platform offers an interactive app that educates and supports children and their caregivers throughout the clinical trial process, aiming to reduce anxiety and improve patient experience. The company has received industry recognition, including the DIA Americas 2024 Inspire Award for Outstanding Contribution to Health. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and includes multimedia testimonials and detailed service descriptions. Privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are well implemented, reflecting a commitment to user data protection and GDPR compliance. From a technical perspective, the website leverages modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, GSAP animations, Wistia video hosting, and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is hosted on Webflow's CDN, ensuring fast performance and good mobile responsiveness. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data; however, the absence of security headers and explicit security policies suggests room for improvement. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing or the domain appears unregistered, which is unusual for a professional business and reduces trustworthiness somewhat. Overall, the website presents a credible and professional business offering in the healthcare technology sector, with strong content quality and privacy compliance. The main risk factor is the unclear domain registration status, which should be verified to enhance trust. Strategic recommendations include adding security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and clarifying domain ownership to improve business credibility and security posture.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention clinicalcompanions.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for clinicalcompanions.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with clinicalcompanions.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clinicalcompanions.com.