Skip to main content

Security report for climate-id.com

ClimatePartner · Energy · Germany

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

87/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ClimatePartner operates in the climate protection sector, offering services that enable businesses to calculate and offset their carbon footprint. The company positions itself as a niche leader in sustainability solutions, targeting organizations committed to environmental responsibility. The website uses modern web technologies including React and Next.js, hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure, indicating a mature and scalable technical foundation. The presence of a detailed cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy reflects a strong commitment to GDPR compliance and user privacy. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and AWS load balancers in use, though improvements such as enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers are recommended. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-aligned with its business objectives, though the absence of contact information and terms of service pages on the analyzed page suggests areas for enhancement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No DKIM record found

      DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

      What to do: Configure DKIM with your email provider

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

Keep watching climate-id.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
90
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
87

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ClimatePartner's market positioning as a provider of climate protection and carbon offsetting services aligns with growing corporate sustainability trends. Their business model focuses on service delivery to enterprises seeking to reduce environmental impact. The company benefits from partnerships and a strong brand presence, as evidenced by consistent branding and domain longevity. Revenue streams likely include consulting, carbon offset sales, and certification services. The target customer segment includes medium to large enterprises with sustainability goals. The technical infrastructure supports scalability and data privacy, enhancing competitive advantage. Strategic observations include the need to expand visible contact channels and legal documentation to strengthen customer trust and compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and use of AWS Application Load Balancers. Cookie consent management is implemented with granular user controls, supporting privacy compliance. However, the lack of visible security headers and absence of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security transparency and defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Compliance with GDPR is evident but could be improved with clearer incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but would benefit from enhanced security controls and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and provide clear incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Add a terms of service page to complete legal documentation and clarify user agreements.
  5. Increase visibility of contact information including support emails and phone numbers to improve customer engagement and credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ClimatePartner
Description
ClimatePartner provides services related to climate protection and carbon offsetting, focusing on enabling businesses to calculate, reduce, and offset their carbon footprint.
Key services
Carbon footprint calculation, Carbon offsetting, Sustainability consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Matomo Analytics, CookieYes Consent Management, AWS DNS and Load Balancer
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with customization
  • Use of AWS Application Load Balancers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo Analytics
Marketing tools
CookieYes Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. The page accessed is a 404 error page indicating a missing resource but the site is fully functional.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed categories and customization options.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on this page.
  4. No terms of service page detected in the content.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  6. No security headers detected in the HTML content; may require further server header inspection.
  7. No visible forms on the 404 page; no data collection forms present.
  8. External links mostly to privacy, imprint, and partner domains.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks (React, Next.js) and leverages AWS infrastructure for hosting and load balancing, indicating a robust and scalable technical environment. The use of Matomo Analytics and CookieYes for consent management shows attention to privacy and analytics needs. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and preloading of critical CSS. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data detected. No CMS is identified, suggesting a custom or framework-based site. Overall, the technical implementation supports business goals but has room for improvements in accessibility and SEO.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with climate-id.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review climate-id.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.