Skip to main content

Security report for climadobrasil.com.br

Media · Brazil

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Climadobrasil.com.br is a Portuguese-language weather forecasting website primarily serving Brazil and offering meteorological information for over 200,000 cities worldwide. The site provides daily and extended weather forecasts, targeting a general audience interested in climate and weather updates. The business model appears to be advertising-supported, leveraging multiple ad networks and tracking technologies to monetize traffic. The website is hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure, indicating a reliable hosting environment. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including JavaScript frameworks, CSS3, and integrates consent management via Didomi SDK, alongside Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing purposes. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is basic, with cookie consent mechanisms present but no visible privacy policy or terms of service pages. No contact or business registration information is publicly available on the site, limiting business credibility verification. Overall, the site is professional and functional but could improve transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Amazon Ads, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching climadobrasil.com.br

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a key weather information provider in Brazil, serving a broad audience interested in meteorology. Its competitive advantage lies in extensive coverage and localized forecasts. Revenue streams are primarily from advertising networks including Amazon Ads and Google Ads. The site integrates advanced consent management tools to comply with privacy regulations, indicating awareness of regulatory requirements. However, the absence of visible company contact details or legal disclosures may impact trust for some users. The partnership ecosystem includes major ad and analytics providers but no clear business partners or subsidiaries are identified. Growth potential is tied to digital advertising and expanding user base in Brazil and Portuguese-speaking markets.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of consent management for privacy compliance. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The site uses third-party scripts extensively, which could introduce risks if not properly managed. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be enhanced by adopting additional security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages prominently accessible to users.
  3. Add a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility compliance and mobile optimization to improve user experience and inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
O Tempo para hoje em Brasil e no resto do mundo. Previsão do tempo para hoje, amanhã e para os próximos dias. O Tempo em 200.000 cidades.
Key services
weather forecasts, meteorological data, weather maps
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5, Google Tag Manager, Didomi Consent SDK, Prebid.js, Amazon Ads, Google Analytics, Privacy Center SDK
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management via Didomi
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Amazon Ads, Google Ad Manager, Prebid.js, Pbstck
Tracking pixels
Didomi Consent SDK
Marketing tools
Didomi Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a weather forecast portal focused on Brazil and global cities.
  2. Content is in Portuguese (pt-br) and targets Brazilian users.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the HTML content provided.
  4. Cookie consent is managed via Didomi SDK with consent mechanisms implemented.
  5. Multiple advertising and tracking scripts are present, including Google Analytics and Amazon Ads.
  6. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
  7. No security policy, incident response, or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. Website uses HTTPS and modern web technologies but lacks explicit security headers.
  9. No signs of adult or unsafe content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It leverages third-party libraries such as Prebid.js for header bidding, Didomi SDK for consent management, and Google Analytics for user tracking. Hosting is provided via Amazon AWS DNS infrastructure, ensuring reliability and scalability. Performance is moderate with preloaded CSS and asynchronous script loading. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data, although no JSON-LD structured data was detected. Accessibility features are basic but present. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy documentation to reduce technical debt and enhance compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with climadobrasil.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review climadobrasil.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.