Skip to main content

Security report for clife.com.au

C-Life Health Club · Hospitality · Australia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

C-Life Health Club is a prominent health and fitness center based in Sydney, Australia, offering modern gym facilities, a wide range of group fitness classes, personal training, and 24/7 access. The business positions itself as a leading health club in the Sydney market, targeting fitness enthusiasts seeking comprehensive wellness services. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and a professional online presence, supported by structured data and social media integration. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with popular plugins such as Gravity Forms and Yoast SEO, hosted likely via Telstra infrastructure. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices but could improve performance and accessibility further. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA usage; however, it lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, with room for improvements in security and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  4. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching clife.com.au

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality sector, specifically health and fitness, with a business model centered on memberships, fitness classes, and ancillary services like squash court hire and loyalty programs. The company appears affiliated with Canterbury League Club, as indicated by social media links and partner domains. The website targets local Sydney residents interested in fitness and wellness, offering a free 7-day trial to attract new members. The presence of multiple partner domains suggests a collaborative ecosystem. The business content is relevant and professionally presented, supporting a medium-sized operation with growth potential. No direct revenue streams or financial data are disclosed, but the comprehensive service offerings and marketing efforts indicate a mature business model.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, and avoids exposing sensitive data in the HTML. However, it lacks DNSSEC for DNS security and does not implement common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are published, which could hinder coordinated security incident handling. Privacy compliance is limited, with no cookie consent mechanism detected, potentially exposing the business to regulatory risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but would benefit from enhancements in DNS security, HTTP headers, and privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and cookie policy to comply with privacy regulations such as GDPR and Australian privacy laws.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any potential vulnerabilities in plugins or custom code.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
C-Life Health Club
Description
Sydney's #1 Health Club & Gym! Experience modern facilities, leading group fitness classes and 24/7 access with a FREE 7-Day trial pass.
Key services
Gym facilities, Group fitness classes, Personal training, Squash court hire, VIP loyalty program, Free 7-day trial
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, Yoast SEO, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Slick Slider
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed health club site targeting Sydney, Australia.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins like Gravity Forms and Yoast SEO.
  3. Includes structured data for SEO and social media integration.
  4. No privacy or cookie consent banner detected, which may be a compliance gap.
  5. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  6. Contact information is clearly presented with phone and physical address.
  7. Social media presence is linked to Canterbury League Club, indicating affiliation.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected; site content is fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging popular plugins like Gravity Forms for form management and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. It uses jQuery and Slick Slider for interactive UI components and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tags. The hosting appears to be managed via Telstra nameservers, indicating Australian-based infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes structured data for SEO benefits. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility features. The technical stack is modern and widely supported but requires updates in security configurations and privacy compliance mechanisms to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with clife.com.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clife.com.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.