Skip to main content

Security report for clickz.com

ClickZ · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ClickZ is a well-established digital marketing media platform offering a wide range of content including news, insights, case studies, resources, and events. The website targets marketing professionals and business leaders interested in marketing technology and innovation. The business operates primarily as a content publisher with advertising and subscription revenue models, positioned as a medium-sized media entity with a consistent brand presence and quality content. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, Algolia search, and multiple analytics and marketing tools. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with good performance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and CAPTCHA protections, though explicit security policies and incident response information are absent. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces trust from a registration perspective, but the website content and external references suggest legitimacy. Overall, the site scores well on content quality, technical implementation, and security, with room for improvement in business credibility and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching clickz.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
27
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ClickZ operates in the media sector focusing on digital marketing and marketing technology. It leverages a content-driven business model with diversified revenue streams including advertising and events. The company targets a professional audience of marketers and digital strategists. Its partnership ecosystem includes contentive.com as the parent company and Fospha as a partner. The website demonstrates strong market positioning with a broad content offering and industry events. Growth indicators include active publishing, webinars, and virtual events. The use of advanced marketing tools and analytics reflects a mature digital presence. However, the lack of direct contact information and missing WHOIS data may impact trust and user engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers (HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options), and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and preparedness perception. The site uses multiple third-party tracking and analytics scripts, which may introduce privacy considerations. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security and incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Add incident response contact information or a security contact email to improve transparency.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and plugins for security vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ClickZ
Description
ClickZ is a media company providing news, insights, case studies, resources, and events focused on digital marketing, marketing technology, innovation, and analytics.
Key services
Digital marketing news and insights, Case studies, Marketing resources and reports, Webinars and virtual events, Podcasts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Algolia Search, Bootstrap, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Google reCAPTCHA, Marketo, Hotjar, Mouseflow, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Ads, Quantcast, Clarity
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Security headers present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Quantcast, Hotjar, Mouseflow, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, DoubleClick, Resads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter Ads Pixel, Hotjar, Mouseflow, Microsoft Clarity, Quantcast
Marketing tools
Marketo, Algolia Search
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional digital marketing media platform with extensive content and resources.
  2. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  4. Strong use of third-party marketing and analytics tools.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and comprehensive.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only.
  7. No security.txt or explicit security policy pages found.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Algolia for search functionality, and multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, Mouseflow, and Facebook Pixel. The site uses Yoast SEO plugin for SEO optimization and Google Tag Manager for tag management. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site employs lazy loading for images and uses modern JavaScript libraries. There is no indication of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the HTML content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital media platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with clickz.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clickz.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.