Skip to main content

Security report for clicktripz.com

Clicktripz · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Clicktripz is a well-established travel advertising network founded in 2010, specializing in providing travel brands and destination marketers with access to a large, contextually targeted travel audience. The company leverages proprietary publisher integrations and a CPC pricing model to deliver high engagement and guaranteed conversions. Their technical infrastructure is based on a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor, enhanced by Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security. Privacy compliance is robust, with GDPR-aligned cookie consent mechanisms in place. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and secure form handling, though some security headers could be improved. Overall, the website is professional, accessible, and trustworthy, with no signs of blocking or malicious content.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of clicktripz.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching clicktripz.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Clicktripz holds a strong market position as one of the largest travel ad networks globally, generating significant booking volumes for advertisers. Their business model focuses on direct publisher integrations and destination marketing solutions, targeting travel shoppers actively planning trips. The company targets travel brands, DMOs, and travel publishers, offering innovative AI-powered conversational ad creatives (CHIME). Partnerships with industry organizations enhance their credibility. The website content and structure support lead generation via demo requests and media kit downloads, indicating a B2B focus. The absence of direct contact emails suggests controlled communication channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms to prevent spam, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of a published security.txt file indicate areas for improvement. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the site balances usability and security effectively but could benefit from additional security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all users.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding direct company contact information such as verified emails and phone numbers to improve trust and communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Clicktripz
Description
Founded in 2010, Clicktripz is among the world’s largest travel ad network, providing travel brands exclusive access to 100 million travel shoppers per month. They partner with travel publishers globally, generating $1B in annual bookings for advertisers. They offer destination marketing solutions with a CPC-based pricing model ensuring guaranteed conversions.
Key services
Travel ad network, Destination marketing solutions, Contextual travel audience targeting, AI-powered conversational ad creative (CHIME)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Elementor 3.10.2, Elementor Pro 3.10.3, Google Analytics (MonsterInsights plugin), Google reCAPTCHA v2 and v3, Complianz GDPR/CCPA Cookie Consent plugin, Font Awesome, jQuery 3.7.1, SmartMenus, Sticky Header Effects for Elementor, Ele Custom Skin plugin
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Clicktripz proprietary network
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Google Analytics by MonsterInsights, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to travel marketing industry.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form only.
  5. No explicit security.txt or incident response info found.
  6. WHOIS data for subdomain is unavailable as expected; main domain WHOIS data missing.
  7. Use of modern WordPress and Elementor technologies.
  8. Google Analytics and LinkedIn Insight used for tracking with consent.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor and Elementor Pro for page building, supported by several plugins including Complianz for GDPR compliance and MonsterInsights for Google Analytics integration. The use of Google Fonts, Font Awesome, and jQuery is standard. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured data. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA v2 and v3 for spam prevention. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The technical stack is well-maintained with no visible technical debt or deprecated technologies, supporting a stable and scalable digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with clicktripz.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clicktripz.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.