Skip to main content

Security report for cleverwebserver.com

Clever Advertising · Media · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Clever Advertising is a medium-sized digital marketing company specializing in affiliate marketing and customer acquisition for the iGaming industry. With over 15 years of experience, they serve multiple international clients through media buying, SEO, PPC, and influencer marketing. Their website reflects a professional brand with consistent messaging and established partnerships. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks, is hosted via Cloudflare, and employs HTTPS with hCaptcha for form security. However, some security headers and DNSSEC are missing, and privacy compliance could be enhanced with explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from formalized policies and incident response information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cleverwebserver.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a premium acquisition partner with a strong affiliate business model targeting iGaming operators worldwide. Their partnerships with well-known brands and multiple projects indicate a robust ecosystem. The business model relies on driving first-time depositing customers through digital channels, leveraging data and technology. Growth indicators include a large volume of impressions and registrations reported for 2024. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a controlled communication channel via forms, possibly for lead qualification.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses hCaptcha to protect its contact form from spam and bots. The domain is secured with clientTransferProhibited status, reducing risk of unauthorized transfers. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which may impact compliance and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.
  2. Implement security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Add explicit cookie consent mechanisms to enhance GDPR compliance.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet higher standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Clever Advertising
Description
An acquisition powerhouse fuelled by clever people, tech, and data. They increase acquisition by sending a significant number of first-time depositing customers through multiple digital channels, helping clients gain market share and secure branding positions through an affiliate business model.
Key services
Media Buying, SEO, PPC, Influencer Marketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Swiper, WOW.js, Fancybox, Odometer, Parallax.js, Google Analytics, hCaptcha
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • hCaptcha implemented on contact form
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
SEO, PPC, Influencer Marketing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear business focus on affiliate marketing for iGaming.
  2. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form only.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic; no explicit cookie consent mechanism detected.
  4. Security posture is good but could be improved with additional headers and DNSSEC.
  5. Use of hCaptcha on contact form enhances spam and bot protection.
  6. Multiple partner logos and external links indicate established partnerships.
  7. No terms of service page found.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Swiper, and animation libraries. Google Analytics is integrated for user tracking, and hCaptcha is used for bot mitigation. Hosting is via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and parallax effects. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in SEO and accessibility. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100Low28 findingsView report
  2. 76/100Low29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cleverwebserver.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cleverwebserver.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.