Skip to main content

Security report for cleaningriga.lv

SIA Cleaning Riga · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CleaningRiga.lv is a professional cleaning service provider operating primarily in Riga, Latvia, and surrounding areas. The company offers a wide range of cleaning services including residential, commercial, hotel, and AirBnB cleaning, as well as specialized services such as post-renovation cleaning and chemical cleaning of furniture. Established since 2010, the company positions itself as a trusted local expert with experienced staff, quality control, and customer loyalty programs. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides multiple contact channels including email, phone, and online forms with privacy consent. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram supports customer engagement. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and embeds multimedia content to enhance user experience. Security posture is good with HTTPS and CSRF protections, though some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are missing. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, which slightly impacts trust but the website content and contact information indicate a legitimate business. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence suitable for its business scope.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cleaningriga.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets both private individuals and businesses in the hospitality and real estate sectors within Riga and nearby regions. Its business model is service-based, offering customizable cleaning packages and emergency cleaning services. Competitive advantages include long-standing market presence, quality assurance via on-site inspections, and use of eco-friendly cleaning agents compliant with EU standards. The company leverages digital marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and live chat for customer support. Revenue streams likely come from recurring contracts, one-time deep cleans, and specialized cleaning services. The company maintains a professional image with consistent branding and transparent pricing. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The business appears small but well-established with a focus on customer satisfaction and operational reliability.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with valid SSL certificates and includes CSRF tokens in forms, indicating attention to secure data handling. However, the absence of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web attacks. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy and consent statements in forms, but the lack of a cookie consent banner is a shortfall for GDPR compliance. No published security policy or incident response contacts were found, which could hinder transparency in case of security incidents. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, cookie consent mechanisms, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR and inform users about tracking and data usage.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider obtaining and displaying relevant certifications or trust badges to strengthen business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Cleaning Riga
Description
Professional cleaning services for private and legal entities in Riga, Riga region, Marupe and Jurmala. Services include apartment, office, hotel, AirBnB cleaning, post-renovation cleaning, window washing, and customized cleaning packages.
Key services
Apartment and office cleaning, Hotel and AirBnB cleaning, Regular, deep, and post-renovation cleaning, Window washing, Chemical cleaning of furniture and textiles, Customized cleaning packages
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, YouTube embeds, Flickity carousel, jQuery (implied by plugins), Custom CSS and fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in meta tag
  • Contact forms with consent and privacy policy links

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Marketing tools
JivoSite live chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No explicit cookie consent banner found despite GDPR relevance.
  4. Multiple contact forms with privacy consent statements.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. Good use of HTTPS and CSRF tokens.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with asynchronous loading of Google Tag Manager and YouTube embeds, enhancing performance and user experience. The use of Flickity carousel and custom fonts indicates attention to design and interactivity. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive layouts and viewport settings. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by meta tags including title, description, and robots directives. Hosting provider and CMS are not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with some heavy multimedia content but optimized loading strategies. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of cookie consent mechanisms, which should be addressed to improve compliance and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cleaningriga.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cleaningriga.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.