Skip to main content

Security report for cleanevents.org

Access Intelligence, LLC. · Energy · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Email security and GDPR outside view.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Clean Events is a professional event hosting organization under Access Intelligence, LLC., focusing on environmental spill prevention, preparedness, and response. Their flagship events, CLEAN Gulf and CLEAN Waterways, serve as premier annual forums for industry leaders and government agencies to collaborate on environmental emergency solutions. The website offers event information, digital content products, job listings, and archives, targeting professionals in the spill response and environmental sectors. The company holds a strong market position in North America with a medium-sized operational scale and a founding date around 2018. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrates multiple third-party services including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, New Relic monitoring, Osano consent management, and OneSignal push notifications. The site is mobile-optimized, SEO-friendly, and employs HTTPS with good security practices, although some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Security posture is solid with no critical vulnerabilities detected, but the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure pages suggests room for improvement. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is typical for this business type and does not raise immediate concerns. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained, supporting the company’s business goals effectively. Recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and improving accessibility features to further strengthen compliance and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cleanevents.org

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
80
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Clean Events operates in the niche market of environmental spill response event hosting, leveraging its parent company Access Intelligence, LLC. The business model centers on organizing annual conferences and providing digital content to industry professionals and government stakeholders. Their competitive advantage lies in their specialized focus on spill prevention and response, strong industry partnerships, and a growing digital presence. Revenue streams likely include event registrations, sponsorships, digital product sales, and advertising. The target customer segments are environmental professionals, emergency planners, government agencies, and industry leaders in maritime, pipeline, rail, and facilities sectors. Growth indicators include expanded digital offerings and active social media engagement. The partnership ecosystem includes related event sites and job listing services, reinforcing their market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent management, and integration of monitoring tools like New Relic. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options indicates potential areas for enhancement. The absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests limited transparency in security governance. Compliance with GDPR is supported by the privacy policy and consent banner. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by formalizing policies and enhancing technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Access Intelligence, LLC.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Access Intelligence, LLC.
Description
CLEAN Gulf and CLEAN Waterways unite industry leaders and government to advance collaboration on environmental response and remediation. The CLEAN Events serve the spill response industry in prevention, preparedness, and response by hosting forums facilitating exchange of ideas, case studies, and best practices for stakeholders from government, environmental, emergency planning and response industries throughout maritime, facilities, rail and pipeline.
Key services
Annual conferences CLEAN Gulf and CLEAN Waterways, Digital products including webinars, virtual events, e-letters, Call for presentations and conference proceedings archives, Job listings related to spill response industry
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.5.2, Bootstrap 5.2.0, jQuery 3.7.1, FontAwesome 6.4.2, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, New Relic Browser monitoring, Osano Consent Management, OneSignal Push Notifications
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security monitoring tools (New Relic)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, New Relic Browser, Omeda Olytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
New Relic, Omeda Olytics
Marketing tools
OneSignal Push Notifications, Osano Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to environmental spill response events.
  3. Strong presence of privacy and cookie consent mechanisms.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact likely via linked parent company site.
  5. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools with consent management.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, likely privacy protected, no negative indicators.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and YouTube.
  8. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for scripting. It integrates multiple third-party services for analytics, consent management, push notifications, and performance monitoring. The site loads scripts asynchronously and uses CDN-hosted libraries to optimize performance. SEO is supported by Yoast plugin metadata and structured data in JSON-LD format. The site is mobile-optimized with a clear navigation structure and professional design. Technical risks include reliance on multiple external scripts which require ongoing monitoring for security and performance. There is no indication of hosting provider details or advanced caching mechanisms. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with opportunities for further optimization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cleanevents.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cleanevents.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.