Skip to main content

Security report for claytonpower.com

Clayton Power · Energy · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Clayton Power operates as a specialized provider of mobile and off-grid power systems, focusing on compact lithium battery-based solutions that are environmentally friendly. Their product offerings include battery generators, inverter/chargers, and lithium batteries, targeting customers who require portable and CO2-friendly energy solutions. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, with a clear focus on energy sector customers. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Cookiebot for consent management, Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, and social media integrations, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses CSRF protection tokens, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness, despite the professional appearance and functionality of the website. Overall, the site demonstrates a moderate to good security posture and technical implementation but requires enhancements in privacy compliance and transparency to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching claytonpower.com

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention claytonpower.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
8
Employees
0
Customers
8
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for claytonpower.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Clayton Power positions itself in the niche market of mobile and off-grid energy solutions, leveraging lithium battery technology to appeal to environmentally conscious consumers and businesses. Their business model centers on manufacturing and selling specialized power systems, with a focus on CO2-friendly products. The company appears to have a small size footprint with no public parent or subsidiary affiliations. The website's use of multiple analytics and advertising platforms suggests an active marketing strategy aimed at broad audience engagement. However, the lack of visible contact information and corporate registration details may limit customer trust and business transparency. The partnership ecosystem includes major advertising and analytics providers but no direct business partners or subsidiaries are identified from the domain data. Strategic growth could benefit from enhanced transparency and clearer business information disclosures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security maturity with mandatory HTTPS encryption and implementation of CSRF tokens to protect forms. The presence of a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot reflects awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found, indicating limited readiness for coordinated vulnerability management. The extensive use of third-party tracking and advertising scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a significant red flag for domain legitimacy and may indicate potential risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with better transparency, security headers, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and transparency.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information, including a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Provide clear and verified contact information including company emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses to increase business credibility.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Clayton Power
Description
Easy access to energy - anywhere! Compact lithium battery based power systems for mobile and off-grid use. CO2-friendly battery generators, inverter/chargers and lithium batteries.
Key services
Battery generators, Inverter/chargers, Lithium batteries
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Swiper.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • CSRF protection cookie (__RequestVerificationToken)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Matomo Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categorization and user controls.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the visible content.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual for an active commercial website.
  6. Multiple third-party tracking and advertising services are used, indicating extensive user tracking.
  7. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools.
  8. Security best practices like HTTPS and CSRF tokens are present but security headers are not explicitly detected.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy information is provided.
  10. Social media presence includes LinkedIn, Facebook, Vimeo, and YouTube links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript frameworks including Swiper.js for UI components. It integrates multiple third-party services such as Cookiebot for cookie consent, Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag for marketing and analytics. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design techniques. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve page speed. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is directly detectable. The site could benefit from improved accessibility features and enhanced SEO metadata. Technical debt appears low but the lack of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent risks that could impact business operations and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with claytonpower.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review claytonpower.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.