Skip to main content

Security report for claptoncountryclub.co.uk

Clapton Country Club · Hospitality · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Clapton Country Club is a small hospitality business located in East London, specializing in unique event venue services including weddings, private events, photoshoots, and creative industry gatherings. The venue emphasizes its distinctive upcycled interior design and offers food and fine wines with an ethical focus. The website is professionally designed, providing clear navigation and multiple contact channels including email, phone, and a newsletter signup form. Technically, the site is built on the Duda platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Snowplow. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though security headers are not explicitly detected and cookie consent mechanisms are absent. The WHOIS lookup for the www subdomain failed due to a naming rule violation, but this is a known limitation and does not detract from the site's legitimacy. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence for a niche hospitality venue.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching claptoncountryclub.co.uk

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets individuals and organizations seeking a unique urban venue in East London for weddings and events, with additional offerings such as a Sunday roast club with table service and delivery. The market position is niche, focusing on cultural and creative events with a strong local identity. Revenue streams likely include venue rental, food and beverage sales, and event hosting. The company maintains a social media presence on Instagram and collects user data via newsletter signups and analytics. There is no evidence of large-scale partnerships or subsidiaries. The business model is straightforward, relying on local clientele and event bookings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms to mitigate spam. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is partial; a privacy policy exists but cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which may pose compliance risks under GDPR. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a small hospitality business but could be improved with enhanced headers and privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to increase transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Clapton Country Club
Description
The Clapton Country Club is an urban retreat venue in East London offering unique weddings, private events, photoshoots, and creative events in film, art, and music industries. It also offers food and fine wines with an ethical emphasis.
Key services
Wedding and event venue rental, Sunday roast club with table service and delivery, Photoshoot location, Creative events in film, art, and music
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.0, Google Analytics (analytics.js, gtag.js), Google Tag Manager, Flexslider, Skrollr, Snowplow Analytics, Cloudfront CDN
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Snowplow Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Snowplow Analytics
Marketing tools
Snowplow Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable due to incorrect query on www subdomain.
  4. Privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected.
  5. Contact information is clear and includes phone, email, address, and contact form.
  6. Use of modern analytics and tracking tools.
  7. No explicit or adult content detected.
  8. Website built on Duda platform with standard third-party libraries.
  9. Security headers are not explicitly detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  10. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Duda platform, utilizing jQuery 3.7.0, Flexslider for image sliders, Skrollr for parallax effects, and Google Analytics and Snowplow for analytics tracking. The site loads resources from multiple CDNs including Cloudfront and static.cdn-website.com. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities in mobile responsiveness and accessibility. SEO basics are covered with meta tags and Open Graph data, but could be enhanced with structured data markup. The site uses HTTPS exclusively, ensuring encrypted communications. No CMS vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected, indicating a well-maintained technical infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with claptoncountryclub.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review claptoncountryclub.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.