Cité Gestion · Finance · Switzerland
Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.
Cité Gestion is a Swiss private bank specializing in personalized wealth management solutions for both Swiss and international clients. The bank emphasizes a unique business model that combines the security and regulatory compliance of a FINMA-regulated institution with the flexibility and independence of an agile private bank. With 15 years of experience and CHF 9.5 billion in assets under management, Cité Gestion positions itself as a trusted partner offering bespoke investment solutions and a high-quality operational infrastructure. The website reflects a professional and well-branded digital presence, supporting multiple languages and featuring multimedia content to engage its audience. Technically, the website employs a modern JavaScript technology stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and reCAPTCHA v3 for security. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and a cookie consent mechanism that aligns with GDPR requirements. However, some security headers are not visibly implemented, and no explicit terms of service or incident response policies are published, which could be improved. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises some concerns about domain registration transparency, although the website content and business information suggest legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced header policies and published security frameworks. The overall risk assessment indicates a professional and trustworthy financial institution with minor gaps in transparency and security documentation. Strategic recommendations include verifying domain registration details, publishing comprehensive security and incident response policies, and implementing additional security headers to strengthen protection and trust.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.
Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention cite-gestion.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for cite-gestion.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with cite-gestion.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cite-gestion.com.