Skip to main content

Security report for cinevillastudios.com

Cinevilla Studio · Media · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cinevilla Studios is a specialized film production company and studio backlot located in Latvia, serving as the only such facility in the Baltics. The company offers a range of services including film production support, tourism experiences such as guided tours and augmented reality games, and event hosting for corporate and thematic gatherings. Their market position is strong within the regional media and tourism sectors, targeting international filmmakers, tourists, and event organizers. The website reflects a professional digital presence built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. SEO and content quality are good, supporting effective audience engagement. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though there is room for improvement in DNS security and HTTP headers. Overall, the website and domain registration data align well, supporting business legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cinevillastudios.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the media and hospitality sectors, leveraging its unique position as the only studio backlot in the Baltics to attract filmmakers and tourists. Its business model combines service provision for film production with tourism and event hosting, creating diversified revenue streams. The website's multilingual support and social media integration indicate a strategy to reach a broad international audience. The absence of explicit contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests a preference for contact forms, which may impact direct communication efficiency. The company appears to be small-sized and founded in 2018, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The use of modern web technologies and SEO tools supports growth and market visibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes a cookie consent banner compliant with GDPR, reflecting awareness of privacy and security requirements. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing risks. The lack of advanced HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options indicates potential areas for hardening against common web attacks. No security policy or incident response information is publicly available, which could hinder transparency and trust in case of security incidents. The use of reCAPTCHA scripts suggests some protection against automated abuse. Overall, the security posture is moderate but would benefit from enhancements in DNS security, header implementation, and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and security.
  2. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Consider adding explicit contact emails and phone numbers for improved user trust and communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cinevilla Studio
Description
Cinevilla Studios is the only studio backlot in the Baltics and a film production company in Latvia. They offer filmmaking services, tourism experiences, and event hosting at their flagship European film industry location.
Key services
Film production facilities, Tourism packages and guided tours, Special events hosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Jet Engine, jQuery, Google Analytics
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WooCommerce
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reCAPTCHA script for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good content.
  2. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML; contact form is present.
  4. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools.
  5. No advanced security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  6. No visible terms of service or security policy pages.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram linked.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using popular plugins such as WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality, Elementor for page building, and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. The presence of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager indicates active traffic monitoring and marketing efforts. The site uses jQuery and other JavaScript libraries for interactivity. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO practices are well implemented with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but the registrar is GoDaddy.com, LLC. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cinevillastudios.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cinevillastudios.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.