Skip to main content

Security report for chorvatske.cz

eProgress s.r.o. · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.chorvatske.cz is operated by eProgress s.r.o. and serves as a comprehensive portal for Croatian accommodation targeting Czech and Slovak tourists. It offers direct contact with property owners, eliminating commission fees, and provides extensive travel information, weather forecasts, and a discussion forum. The platform positions itself as the largest Central and Western European server for Croatian accommodation without commission, with a business model focused on direct owner-to-guest communication. Technically, the site uses modern front-end technologies including Tailwind CSS and JavaScript, and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking with consent mechanisms in place. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces trustworthiness from a domain registration perspective, though the website content and business information appear professional and legitimate. Overall, the site provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content for its audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching chorvatske.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
45
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

eProgress s.r.o. operates multiple regional accommodation portals, including www.chorvatske.cz, www.ceskehory.cz, and others, indicating a diversified portfolio in the hospitality sector. The business model emphasizes direct bookings without intermediaries, appealing to cost-conscious travelers. The company has established a strong market presence since 2003, leveraging localized content and multi-language support. Revenue likely derives from annual fees paid by accommodation providers rather than commissions. The platform's integration with social media and advertising networks supports marketing efforts. The absence of WHOIS data is unusual and should be investigated to ensure domain legitimacy. The company targets primarily Czech and Slovak tourists interested in Croatian destinations, with a focus on transparency and cost savings.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. It implements a cookie consent banner compliant with GDPR, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of additional security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement in defense-in-depth. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder effective vulnerability management and user trust. The use of third-party analytics and advertising scripts introduces potential privacy risks, though consent mechanisms mitigate this. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by adopting best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to enhance trust and legitimacy.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to proactively identify and mitigate risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide detailed data retention policies to improve compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
eProgress s.r.o.
Description
Server Chorvatské hory, ostrovy a pobřeží poskytuje největší množství informací o Chorvatsku na jednom místě a nabízí nejlevnější ubytování bez provize s přímým kontaktem na ubytovatele.
Key services
Accommodation listings, Direct contact with property owners, Travel information (routes, tolls, fuel prices), Weather forecasts and online cameras, Discussion forum
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Tailwind CSS, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
toplist.cz, toplist.sk
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides comprehensive travel and accommodation information for Croatia targeting Czech and Slovak users.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for a professional business site.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  4. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts published.
  5. Uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking with user consent.
  6. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
  7. Website is well structured with good navigation and mobile optimization.
  8. No visible security headers beyond HTTPS.
  9. Direct contact emails and contact form available but no phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Tailwind CSS for styling and JavaScript for interactivity. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking user behavior and marketing campaigns. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and provides a clear navigation structure. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML content. No CMS or hosting provider information was explicitly identified. The site could benefit from improved accessibility features and additional SEO enhancements. The absence of server-side security headers and domain registration data represents technical risks that should be addressed to ensure long-term operational stability and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with chorvatske.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review chorvatske.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.