Skip to main content

Security report for chip.de

BurdaForward GmbH · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CHIP.de is a leading German technology and consumer advice media portal operated by BurdaForward GmbH. The website offers a wide range of services including technology news, product tests, downloadable software, video content, and shopping deals. It targets a broad general audience interested in technology and consumer electronics. The business is well-established and positioned as a major player in the German tech media market. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as JavaScript frameworks (likely React), JSON-LD structured data for SEO, and integrates advanced consent management via Sourcepoint CMP to comply with GDPR. Hosting is provided through Akamai CDN, ensuring fast and reliable content delivery. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses consent mechanisms for tracking, and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly visible, which could be improved. Advertising and tracking are transparent and consent-based, leveraging reputable ad networks and analytics services. Overall, CHIP.de demonstrates a mature digital presence with strong content quality, technical implementation, and privacy compliance. The domain registration data aligns well with the business identity, supporting high legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include publishing explicit security policies, adding vulnerability disclosure information, and enhancing incident response transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
45/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching chip.de

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
80
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
45
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention chip.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,536
Employees
0
Customers
1,485
Third parties
51
Weak passwords
21%

28 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for chip.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CHIP.de operates as a media portal specializing in technology and consumer electronics content. Its business model revolves around advertising revenue, affiliate marketing (notably Amazon affiliate links), and possibly subscription services via ContentPass. The site serves a large German-speaking audience interested in tech news, product reviews, and software downloads. Its partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms and related domains like chip.info. The company benefits from BurdaForward GmbH's backing, a significant media group, which supports its market position and growth potential.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security posture with enforced HTTPS, integration of a GDPR-compliant consent management platform, and no visible exposure of sensitive information. The use of Akamai CDN adds a layer of protection and performance. However, the absence of a publicly accessible security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents gaps in transparency and readiness. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected in the analyzed content.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Ensure all recommended security headers are explicitly set and documented.
  5. Maintain transparency about data retention policies and enhance user privacy controls.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
BurdaForward GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BurdaForward GmbH
Description
CHIP - Deutschlands großes Tech- und Verbraucherportal für News, Bestenlisten, Downloads, unabhängige Tests & Kaufberatung und mehr!
Key services
technology news, product tests and reviews, downloadable software, consumer advice and buying guides, video content, deal and discount offers
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, JSON-LD, Sourcepoint CMP, CleverPush, GreenVideo carousel, AppNexus ad integration, ContentPass (cp.chip.de), LazyLoad library
Frameworks
Sourcepoint CMP for consent management
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management platform integrated
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure authentication mocks for content subscription

Analytics and tracking

Services
Snowplow
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
AppNexus, Amazon Ads, Outbrain, BF Ad Network
Tracking pixels
Sourcepoint CMP, Snowplow (utag.js), CleverPush
Marketing tools
Sourcepoint CMP, Snowplow Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional German technology media portal operated by BurdaForward GmbH.
  2. Comprehensive content including news, tests, downloads, videos, and deals.
  3. Strong GDPR compliance with integrated consent management platform.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  6. Advertising and tracking are transparent and consent-based.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response contact publicly visible.
  8. WHOIS data is consistent and trustworthy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack with JavaScript frameworks, JSON-LD for structured data, and integrates multiple third-party services for advertising, analytics, and consent management. Hosting via Akamai CDN ensures high availability and performance. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured data. There is no indication of technical debt or outdated libraries. Opportunities exist to enhance security transparency and incident response capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with chip.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review chip.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.