Skip to main content

Security report for chillizet.pl

Eurozet Sp. z o.o. · Media · Poland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Chillizet.pl is a Polish media website affiliated with the radio brand Chillizet, operated by Eurozet Sp. z o.o. It offers a variety of content including articles on social, ecological, health, cultural, culinary, psychological, and travel topics, alongside podcasts and radio streaming services. The site targets a general audience interested in lifestyle and culture. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager, DoubleClick advertising, OneTrust for cookie consent, and analytics tools like Gemius and Hotjar, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment, but the professional presentation and clear business information support legitimacy. Overall, the site is well-designed, content-rich, and compliant with privacy regulations, making it a credible media outlet in its market niche.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching chillizet.pl

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates within the media sector, focusing on content publishing and audio streaming. It leverages advertising networks and analytics to monetize and optimize user engagement. The connection to Eurozet Sp. z o.o. and the radio brand Chillizet positions it well in the Polish media landscape. The business model relies on advertising revenue and audience engagement through podcasts and articles. The presence of multiple external domains related to advertising and analytics reflects a broad partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators include active podcast content and integration with social media. Strategic observations suggest maintaining strong compliance and enhancing security policies to sustain trust.

Security posture

Chillizet.pl demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR requirements. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not evident, representing an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. Overall, the site follows basic security best practices but could enhance its posture by adopting additional headers and publishing security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and advertising networks for security and privacy compliance.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Eurozet Sp. z o.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eurozet Sp. z o.o.
Description
Chillizet.pl is a media service related to radio Chillizet, publishing articles on social, ecological, health topics, and travel stories.
Key services
Online articles, Podcasts, Radio streaming
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, DoubleClick for Publishers (DFP), OneTrust cookie consent, Marfeel SDK, Splide.js carousel, Hotjar, Gemius analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Gemius Audience, Gemius HeatMap, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Yieldbird, Rubicon Project, Smart AdServer, Adnxs (AppNexus)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Gemius
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent, Marfeel SDK
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  3. Professional media site with consistent branding
  4. Uses multiple advertising and analytics technologies
  5. Cookie consent and GDPR compliance mechanisms present
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based tech stack with integrations for advertising (Google DFP, Yieldbird), analytics (Gemius, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity), and consent management (OneTrust). The presence of preconnect and preload hints indicates performance optimization efforts. The site is mobile responsive with adaptive CSS and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO benefits. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not available from the data. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with chillizet.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review chillizet.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.