Skip to main content

Security report for chiesi.pl

Chiesi Poland · Healthcare · Poland

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Chiesi Poland operates as a pharmaceutical company specializing in therapeutic areas such as respiratory health, neonatology, transplantology, and pediatrics. The company is part of the international Chiesi Group and demonstrates a commitment to corporate social responsibility, sustainability, and ethical business practices, evidenced by its B Corp certification. The website serves healthcare professionals, patients, and partners in Poland, providing product information, corporate news, and resources. Technically, the website employs a range of JavaScript libraries including jQuery, bxSlider, and Colorbox, alongside Google Maps API and OneTrust for cookie consent management. Accessibility is enhanced through the integration of AccessiWay. The site is mobile optimized and presents a professional design with clear navigation, although SEO metadata and structured data are minimal. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks visible security headers and does not publish a security or incident response policy. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the professional content and corporate branding support legitimacy. Overall, the website is well-constructed and compliant with privacy regulations, but could improve transparency around security policies and domain registration details to enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching chiesi.pl

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Chiesi Poland holds a solid position in the Polish pharmaceutical market as a subsidiary of the global Chiesi Group. Its business model focuses on prescription medicines and pediatric products, supported by active research and development efforts. The company targets healthcare providers and patients, emphasizing quality of life improvements and ethical business conduct. The presence of multiple country-specific Chiesi domains indicates a broad international footprint. The website's content and structure reflect a mature corporate entity with a focus on sustainability and social responsibility, which may appeal to stakeholders valuing ethical business practices. The lack of detailed WHOIS data is a minor concern but does not detract significantly from the company's established market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via OneTrust, indicating GDPR compliance. Accessibility features are implemented through AccessiWay, enhancing usability for diverse users. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, limiting transparency and readiness communication. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a corporate site but could be strengthened by adopting additional security best practices and publishing relevant policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness communication.
  3. Create and host a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance SEO by adding proper meta titles, descriptions, and Open Graph tags to improve search engine visibility and social media sharing.
  5. Improve WHOIS transparency or provide domain registration details on the website to increase trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Chiesi Poland
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Chiesi Poland
Description
Chiesi Poland is a pharmaceutical company dedicated to healthcare, focusing on therapeutic areas such as respiratory system, neonatology, transplantology, and pediatrics. The company emphasizes research and development, corporate social responsibility, and sustainability, holding B Corp certification.
Key services
Pharmaceutical products, Research and development, Corporate social responsibility initiatives
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, bxSlider, Colorbox, Google Maps API, OneTrust Cookie Consent, AccessiWay Accessibility
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
OneTrust, Facebook SDK, Twitter Widgets
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent, AccessiWay Accessibility
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WHOIS data available from registry, limiting domain trust verification
  3. Strong privacy and cookie compliance with OneTrust implementation
  4. Corporate branding consistent with Chiesi Group international presence
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. Good accessibility features via AccessiWay
  8. No explicit SEO metadata or Open Graph tags detected
  9. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities in HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery and several jQuery plugins for sliders, modals, and UI enhancements. Google Maps API integration supports location display. Cookie consent is managed by OneTrust, a widely used compliance tool. Accessibility is addressed with AccessiWay, indicating attention to inclusive design. The site is mobile responsive and has a professional layout. However, the absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary solution, which may impact ease of maintenance. Performance is moderate, with some opportunities for optimization. SEO metadata is minimal, and structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph tags are not present, limiting search engine optimization. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and SEO improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with chiesi.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review chiesi.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.