Skip to main content

Security report for chickteases.com

Media · N/a

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Chickteases.com operates as an adult entertainment website specializing in free nude and pornographic photo galleries, targeting an adult audience. The site aggregates adult content and provides links to various partner adult sites, positioning itself as a niche media platform within the adult entertainment industry. The business model relies on content aggregation and referral traffic to partner sites. Technically, the website uses legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.5.2 and Google Analytics for tracking, with a basic HTML and CSS structure. Mobile optimization and accessibility are limited, and no modern CMS or frameworks are detected. Security posture is weak, with no visible security headers and use of outdated libraries, increasing vulnerability risk. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating poor compliance with data protection regulations. WHOIS data is unavailable, raising concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. Overall, the site is functional but lacks modern security, privacy, and technical best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching chickteases.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets adult content consumers seeking free galleries and links to other adult sites. It maintains partnerships with several known adult domains, enhancing its referral network. The business appears small-scale with limited branding and no visible corporate information or certifications. Revenue likely derives from affiliate marketing and advertising. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, combined with missing WHOIS data, may hinder trust and compliance. The site’s competitive advantage lies in its curated adult content and partner ecosystem, but technical debt and security weaknesses pose operational risks.

Security posture

Security maturity is low. The site lacks essential security headers such as Content Security Policy and X-Frame-Options. The use of an outdated jQuery version exposes it to known vulnerabilities. No HTTPS enforcement details are visible, though external scripts load via HTTPS. No incident response or security policy information is provided. Absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and similar regulations. The site does not provide contact emails or phone numbers for security or abuse reporting, limiting incident response readiness. Overall, the security posture is insufficient for protecting user data and maintaining regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries to current secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Add security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance security posture.
  4. Enforce HTTPS site-wide and ensure all resources load securely.
  5. Provide clear contact information for security and abuse reporting to improve incident response capabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Naked girls and young mondels free pictures and galleries.
Key services
Free adult photo galleries, Links to partner adult sites, Search functionality for adult content
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.5.2, Google Analytics, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of HTTPS implied by external scripts loaded via https

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content gallery and link aggregator
  2. No visible privacy or cookie policies found
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed
  4. Only contact form available for communication
  5. Use of outdated JavaScript libraries
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security measures
  7. Content is accessible without WAF or blocking
  8. Multiple external adult content partner links present
  9. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found
  10. Google Analytics used for tracking
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML5 and CSS with legacy JavaScript libraries, notably jQuery 1.5.2, which is outdated and vulnerable. Google Analytics is used for user tracking. The site lacks modern frameworks or CMS platforms, indicating a simple custom build. Performance is moderate but mobile optimization is poor, with viewport meta tag set incorrectly (initial-scale=0). SEO is basic with meta description and keywords but no structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are minimal. Hosting provider and SSL certificate details are not discernible from the content. The site would benefit from modernization, improved mobile responsiveness, and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with chickteases.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review chickteases.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.