Skip to main content

Security report for chargepoint.com

ChargePoint, Inc. · Energy · United States

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ChargePoint, Inc. operates one of the world's largest electric vehicle (EV) charging networks, providing hardware, software, and services to businesses, fleets, partners, and individual drivers. The company has a strong market position as a pioneer in EV charging solutions since 2007, targeting multiple sectors including energy and transportation. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, regional localization, and a professional design that supports their business objectives. Technically, the website is built on Drupal CMS and integrates modern technologies such as Google Maps API, Google Tag Manager, and OneTrust for cookie consent. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, indicating a high level of digital maturity. Security practices include HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers and explicit incident response contacts are not evident. The security posture is solid with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies, including GDPR compliance indicators. However, the WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, which slightly reduces transparency but is not uncommon for large enterprises. Overall, ChargePoint's website and digital infrastructure demonstrate a high level of professionalism, security, and compliance suitable for an enterprise in the energy and transportation sectors. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy, and providing explicit incident response contacts to further strengthen trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 18 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching chargepoint.com

This scan found 12 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Email security
95
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
81
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention chargepoint.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,366
Employees
3
Customers
2,290
Third parties
73
Weak passwords
6%

Latest record dated 2026-06-05 · 44 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for chargepoint.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –na.chargepoint.com2026-06-05
  • –na.chargepoint.com2025-07-28
  • –eu.chargepoint.com2025-04-14

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ChargePoint holds a leading position in the EV charging market, leveraging a comprehensive business model that combines hardware sales, software platform services, and partner ecosystems. Their revenue streams likely include charging station sales, software subscriptions, fleet management solutions, and partner program fees. The company targets a broad customer base including commercial businesses, fleet operators, and individual EV drivers. Growth indicators include extensive regional localization, a robust partner program, and active social media engagement. The company’s strategic focus on sustainability and EV adoption aligns with global trends, positioning it well for continued expansion.

Security posture

ChargePoint exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent, and no visible sensitive data leaks. The absence of some security headers and a public incident response contact or vulnerability disclosure policy suggests areas for improvement. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy policies and cookie mechanisms. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a minor concern but does not significantly impact overall trust given the company’s established market presence. The security culture appears proactive but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized vulnerability management disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide explicit incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and integrations for security vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance WHOIS transparency if possible to improve domain registration trust signals.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ChargePoint, Inc.
Description
ChargePoint is the world's largest network of electric vehicle (EV) charging stations in the US, Europe, Australia. They provide EV charging hardware, software, and services to businesses, fleets, and drivers.
Key services
EV charging stations (Level 2 AC and Level 3 DC fast charging), Software platform for managing charging operations, Mobile app for drivers, Fleet solutions and telematics, Partner programs and training
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal CMS, Google Maps API, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong focus on EV charging solutions for multiple audiences
  3. Multiple language and regional versions available
  4. Comprehensive navigation and well-structured menus
  5. Use of modern web technologies and third-party integrations
  6. Presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers visible on main pages
  8. Social media presence on major platforms
  9. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure policy found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a robust Drupal CMS platform with integration of modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js and Google Maps API. The use of Google Tag Manager centralizes analytics and marketing scripts, improving manageability. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site uses OneTrust for cookie consent, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. Technical risks are minimal but include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security monitoring. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and incident response transparency to reduce technical debt and enhance resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with chargepoint.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review chargepoint.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.