Skip to main content

Security report for chargemap-business.com

Chargemap Business · Energy · France

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Chargemap Business is a professional B2B platform specializing in electric vehicle fleet charging management solutions. The company offers a comprehensive suite of services including charging on the road, workplace charging, and home charging reimbursement, supported by a multi-network recharge card and a mobile app used by over one million drivers. Their market position is strong with over 3,300 business customers and a high Trustpilot rating, indicating customer satisfaction and trust. Technically, the website is built on modern technologies such as Webflow CMS, GSAP animations, and integrates major analytics and tracking tools like Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel. The site is well optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility. Security posture is good with HTTPS and secure forms, but lacks publicly available security policies or incident response information. WHOIS data is missing, which slightly reduces trust but the professional web presence and business indicators suggest legitimacy. Overall, the website is a high-quality, trustworthy platform serving the EV fleet management sector with room for improvement in transparency of security and contact details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching chargemap-business.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Chargemap Business operates in the energy and transportation sectors, targeting medium-sized businesses and enterprises managing electric vehicle fleets. Their business model revolves around SaaS solutions combined with hardware (charging cards) and support services. The company leverages partnerships and a strong digital presence to maintain competitive advantage. Their ecosystem includes integrations with Tesla Superchargers and multiple charging networks. The presence of detailed customer testimonials, Trustpilot ratings, and a broad service offering indicates a mature and customer-focused operation. The company emphasizes ease of use, budget control, and comprehensive monitoring, appealing to fleet managers and corporate decision-makers. Growth indicators include new features like kilometer reading tracking and Tesla network access. The company maintains active social media channels and content resources such as blogs, white papers, and case studies to engage and educate their audience.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS encryption and secure form handling including consent checkboxes. It uses reputable third-party analytics and tracking services with privacy compliance measures in place. However, there is no publicly available security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program, which are important for transparency and trust. The absence of security headers in the provided data suggests potential for improvement in HTTP security configurations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data is a concern but may be due to privacy protection. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing security policies, incident response contacts, and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information for security issues.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Add explicit company phone numbers and physical address to improve business credibility and contact transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Chargemap Business
Description
Chargemap Business offers comprehensive charging solutions for companies: on-the-road charging, on-site charging, and home charging.
Key services
Charging on the road, Charging at the workplace, Home charging for drivers, Re-invoicing workplace charging, Charging solutions for customers
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform), Splide.js (carousel), Plezi forms, jQuery 3.5.1, SplitType.js, Webflow CMS
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with consent checkboxes
  • Use of reputable analytics and tracking services

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Plezi forms
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is a concern but not definitive of illegitimacy.
  3. Strong presence of business trust signals including testimonials and Trustpilot rating.
  4. Good privacy and cookie policy presence with consent mechanisms.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  7. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed on the site.
  8. Contact primarily via email and contact forms.
  9. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and performant tech stack including Webflow CMS, GSAP for animations, Splide.js for carousels, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and Plezi forms. It uses AWS Cloudfront CDN for hosting and content delivery, ensuring fast load times globally. The site is well optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with semantic HTML and ARIA roles. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The use of multiple external scripts is well managed and asynchronous loading is employed to optimize performance. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries. Overall, the technical implementation is robust, modern, and aligned with best practices for a business SaaS platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with chargemap-business.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review chargemap-business.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.