Skip to main content

Security report for cg-magazine.com

Cybergroup Magazine · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cybergroup Magazine is an online media publication built on the Wix platform, targeting German-speaking audiences with content presumably related to cybersecurity or technology topics. The website uses Wix's Thunderbolt framework and standard polyfills to ensure compatibility and performance. However, the site lacks critical business and security information such as privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, contact details, and incident response contacts. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Technically, the site is moderately optimized for mobile and performance but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is basic with no visible security headers or policies. Overall, the site presents as a small-scale media outlet with room for significant improvements in compliance, security, and business transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cg-magazine.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a media outlet under the brand 'Cybergroup Magazine' but provides minimal business information or trust signals. The business model appears to be content publishing, targeting a general audience interested in cyber or technology topics. There is no evidence of monetization strategies such as advertising or affiliate marketing in the analyzed content. The lack of contact information and company details limits the ability to assess market positioning or partnerships. The site is likely a small or startup operation with limited digital maturity and business ecosystem integration.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is low. There are no detected security headers, no visible HTTPS enforcement details, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. The WHOIS data absence is a red flag for domain legitimacy. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content, but the lack of security best practices and transparency increases risk. The site should implement standard security headers, privacy compliance measures, and provide clear security contact channels to improve its posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance.
  2. Add contact information including security incident response and abuse reporting channels.
  3. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is publicly available or justified by privacy protection.
  4. Enhance security by adding HTTP security headers and enforcing HTTPS.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cybergroup Magazine
Description
Cybergroup Magazine is a media website presenting content presumably related to cyber topics, as indicated by the site name and title. The site is built using Wix.com Website Builder and targets German language users.
Key services
online magazine content
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, JavaScript, core-js polyfill, focus-within-polyfill, Intl.Segmenter polyfill, Wix Thunderbolt framework
Frameworks
Wix Thunderbolt
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and polyfills.
  2. No visible contact information or company details on the homepage.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
  4. No security or incident response information found.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered, which is unusual for an active site.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  7. Content is in German language, targeting German-speaking users.
  8. Site uses HTTPS as indicated by canonical and og:url tags.
  9. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  10. No social media links or emails found in the visible content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Wix.com, leveraging its Thunderbolt framework and standard polyfills for browser compatibility. The tech stack is modern but limited to Wix's ecosystem, which may restrict customization and advanced SEO or accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no evident heavy scripts or trackers. Mobile optimization is good due to Wix's responsive design capabilities. However, the site lacks advanced SEO metadata beyond basic Open Graph and JSON-LD for website schema. There is no evidence of analytics or marketing tools integration. Technical debt appears low but the site would benefit from improved SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cg-magazine.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cg-magazine.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.