Skip to main content

Security report for cfizio.lv

V. Amosova fizioterapeita prakse · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

V. Amosova fizioterapeita prakse is a small physiotherapy practice based in Rēzekne, Latvia, offering a range of therapeutic services including manual therapy, massage, rehabilitation exercises, and specialized treatments such as Bobath therapy and Voita reflex therapy. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear service descriptions targeted at local patients seeking physiotherapy care. The technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies such as service workers for offline support and Google Analytics for visitor tracking, hosted likely on a CDN platform. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and detailed security policies. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent banner and a privacy policy page in Latvian. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-positioned for its local healthcare market niche.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cfizio.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cfizio.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for cfizio.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the healthcare sector, specifically physiotherapy services, with a focus on individual patient care and rehabilitation. Founded in 2012, it leverages specialized physiotherapy techniques to serve diverse patient groups including infants, seniors, and athletes. The business model is service-oriented, relying on direct patient engagement. The website supports business credibility through detailed service descriptions and contact mechanisms, although explicit contact emails and phone numbers were not found in the provided content. The company appears to maintain a local market position without evident partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth indicators include a comprehensive service offering and a professional online presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, and a service worker is registered to enhance user experience and offline capabilities. However, there is no evidence of advanced security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS. No incident response or security policy information is available. The site includes a cookie consent mechanism indicating awareness of privacy regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small healthcare service website but could be improved with enhanced headers, explicit security policies, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Add explicit security and incident response policies accessible from the website.
  3. Ensure all forms have CSRF protection and validate inputs to prevent injection attacks.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by providing detailed data retention policies and explicit GDPR statements.
  5. Consider publishing verified contact emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
V. Amosova fizioterapeita prakse
Description
Fizioterapijas pakalpojumi - ārstnieciskā vingrošana, masāža, zīdaiņu masāža, bobata terapija, dziļās oscilācijas elektroterapija, transkutānā elektrostimulācija (TENS)
Key services
Ārstnieciskā vingrošana, Masāža, Zīdaiņu masāža, Bobata terapija, Dziļās oscilācijas elektroterapija, Transkutānā elektrostimulācija (TENS), Slingu terapija, Manuālā terapija, Biomehāniskā teipošana, Voita refleksoterapija
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cloudfront CDN, Bower Skrollr, Service Worker, FontAwesome, Source Sans Pro font, Inter font
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical URL
  • Service worker registered for offline support
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional physiotherapy practice site in Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian language with clear service descriptions.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented.
  4. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  5. No explicit security headers information available.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  7. Site uses modern web technologies including service workers and Google Analytics.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. No visible forms with input fields in the provided snippet except contact form references.
  10. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cloudfront CDN, and service workers for offline support. Fonts used include Source Sans Pro and Inter, enhancing readability. The site appears to be built on a proprietary or custom CMS platform, likely associated with ltweb.lv. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Technical risks include lack of visible security headers and limited WHOIS data for domain verification. Opportunities exist to improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cfizio.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cfizio.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.