Skip to main content

Security report for cfbv.com

Chevalier Floatels B.V. · Energy · Netherlands

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Chevalier Floatels B.V. is a specialized company operating in the offshore energy and maritime sector, providing walk to work vessels and floating accommodation barges. With over ten years of industry experience, the company emphasizes safety, efficiency, and quality service delivery. Their website reflects a professional presence with clear business information and contact details, targeting clients needing offshore accommodation and support vessels. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins like Yoast SEO and Revolution Slider, offering moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, reducing trustworthiness despite the professional website. Overall, the site scores well on content and business credibility but should improve transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cfbv.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cfbv.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for cfbv.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche provider in the offshore accommodation and walk to work vessel market, serving energy and maritime clients. Their business model involves owning and operating specialized vessels and floating hotels, focusing on crew welfare and operational efficiency. The website content and recent news indicate active engagement in projects and a commitment to quality. The company is small-sized, based in the Netherlands, with no visible parent or subsidiary companies. The lack of explicit privacy and security policies suggests room for maturity in compliance and governance. Social media presence is minimal with placeholder links, indicating limited digital marketing efforts. The company benefits from a clean, professional website that supports its market positioning but should enhance transparency and security to build greater trust.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent banner, demonstrating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. There is no published security policy or incident response information, limiting transparency and preparedness signals. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is unusual and may indicate registration or privacy issues, impacting trust. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting best practices in headers, policy publication, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance social media presence with valid links and active engagement to support marketing and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Chevalier Floatels B.V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Chevalier Floatels B.V.
Description
Chevalier Floatels is a young and energetic company with over ten years of experience in the flotel industry. They own and operate two walk to work service support vessels and four floating hotels. The company emphasizes health and safety, fast decision making, and delivering top quality at reasonable prices.
Key services
Walk to work service support vessels, Floating hotels (accommodation barges)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Revolution Slider, jQuery, Cookie Law Info plugin
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  4. Contact information including physical address, phone, and email clearly displayed
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  6. WHOIS data missing or domain unregistered according to raw WHOIS output
  7. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins
  8. No external analytics or advertising scripts detected
  9. Social media links present but URLs are placeholders (#)
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using popular plugins including Yoast SEO for search optimization and Revolution Slider for visual content. It uses jQuery and a cookie consent plugin to manage privacy compliance. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with some potential for improvement in loading speed and technical SEO. No advanced frameworks or hosting provider details were identified. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but meets basic standards. Technical debt appears low, but security enhancements and policy transparency are recommended to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cfbv.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cfbv.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.