Skip to main content

Security report for ceskytesin-chachar.cz

Chachar catering s.r.o. · Hospitality · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Chachar catering s.r.o. operates a regional online food delivery service specializing in pizza, chicken wings, burgers, and lunch menus primarily serving the Český Těšín area in the Czech Republic. The website provides a user-friendly platform for ordering food online or by phone, targeting general consumers seeking quick and quality food delivery. The business is medium-sized, founded in 2019, and maintains consistent branding and clear contact information, supporting its market presence in the hospitality sector. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 4.9.8 with common libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and FontAwesome. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and basic SEO practices. Hosting appears to be Czech-based, consistent with the business location. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA, but lacks modern security headers and runs an outdated WordPress version, which may expose it to vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is addressed with a cookie consent mechanism and linked privacy and terms pages, indicating GDPR awareness. However, no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and trustworthy for its business purpose but would benefit from technical updates and enhanced security measures to reduce risk and improve compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ceskytesin-chachar.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets local consumers in the Czech Republic seeking convenient food delivery, leveraging an online ordering platform integrated with phone support. Its business model focuses on quick delivery of pizza and related food items, supplemented by gift vouchers and lunch menus. The company maintains a consistent brand identity and operates multiple regional branches (as indicated by links to other locations). Revenue streams likely include direct online sales and catering services. The partnership ecosystem includes digital agencies for website development and hosting providers. Growth indicators include multiple branch domains and active online presence. Strategic observations suggest a focus on regional market penetration and customer loyalty through rewards and repeat ordering features.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA is implemented to mitigate automated abuse. However, the use of an outdated WordPress version (4.9.8) introduces potential vulnerabilities. The absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No published incident response or security policies limit transparency and preparedness. Data protection practices include cookie consent and privacy policy adherence, but no dedicated security contact or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. Overall, the site is functional but requires updates and enhanced security controls to meet modern standards and reduce risk exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade WordPress core and all plugins/themes to the latest stable versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and monitor website security posture using automated tools and penetration testing.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and appointing a Data Protection Officer if applicable.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Chachar catering s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Chachar catering s.r.o.
Description
Bleskový rozvoz pizzy, křídel a dalšího jídla z kvalitních a čerstvých surovin. Objednávejte online nebo telefonicky a vychutnejte si Chacharovy speciality.
Key services
Pizza delivery, Chicken wings, Burgers, Lunch menus, Gift vouchers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.9.8, jQuery 3.3.1, Bootstrap 4.3.1, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v2 invisible, FontAwesome 5.8.1, Slick Carousel, Contact Form 7
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
PHP-based CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on login form
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional Czech pizza and food delivery service.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with several custom plugins.
  3. Includes cookie consent and privacy policy pages indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  5. Uses Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA for analytics and bot protection.
  6. Phone contact is clearly displayed and consistent.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. WordPress version is outdated, posing potential security risks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a mature but outdated WordPress CMS version 4.9.8, combined with common frontend libraries like jQuery 3.3.1 and Bootstrap 4.3.1. Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA are integrated for analytics and bot protection. The site is hosted likely by Forpsi (based on nameservers) and registered via REG-INTERNET-CZ, consistent with Czech hosting providers. Performance is moderate with standard CSS and JS assets loaded from both local and CDN sources. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is basic with meta tags and canonical links but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Technical debt is indicated by outdated WordPress and some legacy scripts, suggesting modernization opportunities to improve security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ceskytesin-chachar.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ceskytesin-chachar.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.