Skip to main content

Security report for monika.centrumhotels.com

CENTRUM HOTELS · Hospitality · Lithuania

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CENTRUM HOTELS operates a group of four-star hotels located primarily in Vilnius, Lithuania, and Riga, Latvia. The company offers a range of hospitality services including accommodation, dining, conference facilities, and wellness amenities. Their market position is that of an established regional hotel group with a medium-sized footprint and a focus on quality service for travelers and tourists. The website is professionally designed with multilingual support and optimized for mobile devices using AMP technology. The technical infrastructure leverages WordPress CMS with modern SEO and analytics tools, ensuring good performance and user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though there is room for improvement in security headers and incident response transparency. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain reduces trust slightly but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy of the business. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing clear security policies, and improving domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching monika.centrumhotels.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets travelers seeking quality four-star accommodations in the Baltic region, leveraging multiple hotel brands to diversify offerings. Their business model focuses on hospitality services with revenue streams from room bookings, dining, and event hosting. The company demonstrates a consistent brand presence and uses partnerships for website development. Growth indicators include multilingual support and a modern web presence. The partnership ecosystem includes web development firms but lacks visible strategic alliances in hospitality or travel sectors. Operationally, the company maintains a professional digital footprint but could benefit from enhanced transparency in domain registration and security disclosures.

Security posture

CENTRUM HOTELS exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and GDPR-compliant cookie consent implemented. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS, absence of incident response contact information, and missing vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicate gaps in security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. Compliance with GDPR is evident but could be strengthened with more comprehensive privacy and security documentation. The security culture appears functional but would benefit from formalized policies and public security communications to enhance trust and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Improve domain registration transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is complete and accurate.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for security vulnerabilities and update them promptly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CENTRUM HOTELS
Description
Official Centrum Hotels website offering four luxurious four-star hotels in Vilnius (Artis, Grata, Ratonda) and one in Riga (Monika).
Key services
Hotel accommodation, Restaurant services, Conference facilities, Wellness amenities (sauna, gym)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
AMP (Accelerated Mobile Pages), Google Analytics, WordPress, Yoast SEO, WPML (Multilingual CMS plugin)
Frameworks
AMP framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with multilingual support.
  3. Strong use of AMP for mobile optimization and performance.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented, indicating GDPR awareness.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  7. No visible incident response or security contact information.
  8. No terms of service page found.
  9. Multiple hotel brands under the Centrum Hotels group are promoted.
  10. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with AMP framework for enhanced mobile performance. It uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking and SEO plugins for optimization. The site loads quickly and is mobile-optimized with responsive design and multilingual support via WPML. The technical implementation is modern and aligns with best practices for performance and SEO. However, the absence of visible security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks that could impact trust and security posture. Hosting provider details are not disclosed, which limits full infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical stack is solid but could be improved with enhanced security configurations and transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with monika.centrumhotels.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review monika.centrumhotels.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.