Centrum sociálních a zdravotních služeb Poděbrady is a well-established non-profit organization providing comprehensive social and health care services primarily in the Středočeský kraj region of the Czech Republic. Founded in 1976, it serves seniors, disabled individuals, and foster families with a broad range of services including home health care, hospice care, social assistance, and foster care support. The organization maintains a strong regional presence with multiple branches and partnerships with government ministries and local authorities. The website reflects a professional and community-focused business model with clear service offerings and active engagement through news updates and social media.
Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging modern web technologies such as Bootstrap for responsive design, Leaflet for interactive maps, and Splide.js for sliders. It integrates analytics tools like Google Analytics and Hotjar for user behavior insights and employs CookieYes for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, SEO practices, and accessibility basics, although there is room for improvement in security headers and accessibility features.
From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories, enhancing privacy compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers and a vulnerability disclosure policy suggests opportunities to strengthen the security posture further.
Overall, the domain appears legitimate and consistent with the organization's profile, despite limited WHOIS data due to privacy protections. The website is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, providing a trustworthy and professional online presence. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, formalizing vulnerability disclosure, and improving accessibility compliance to further solidify trust and security.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
67
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention centrum-podebrady.info, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for centrum-podebrady.info right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The organization holds a strong market position as a regional leader in social and health services within the Czech Republic, supported by partnerships with multiple government ministries and regional authorities. Its business model focuses on non-profit social care, targeting vulnerable populations such as seniors, disabled persons, and foster families. Revenue streams likely include government funding and grants, as indicated by partner logos and funding acknowledgments. The website content and structure indicate active community engagement and transparency, with frequent news updates and detailed service descriptions. The partnership ecosystem includes ministries of labor, health, local municipalities, and social service associations, reinforcing credibility and operational scale. Growth indicators include multiple branch locations and ongoing recruitment efforts. The organization leverages digital tools for outreach and service promotion but could benefit from enhanced digital security and privacy frameworks.
Security posture
The current security maturity level is moderate to good. The website enforces HTTPS, uses Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection, and implements a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a compliance gap that could expose the site to clickjacking or MIME sniffing attacks. There is no visible incident response or security policy documentation, nor a vulnerability disclosure mechanism, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Data protection practices appear adequate for the business type, but formalizing incident response and enhancing security headers would improve the security culture and compliance posture. Overall, the security posture is sufficient for a non-profit healthcare service but can be improved to meet higher standards.
Recommendations
Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to minimize risks from outdated components.
Enhance accessibility features to comply with WCAG standards, improving usability for all users.
Continue to monitor third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure ongoing privacy compliance and minimize user tracking.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Centrum sociálních a zdravotních služeb Poděbrady
Description
Centrum zdravotních a sociálních služeb v Poděbradech poskytuje zdravotní péči a služby občanům, kteří potřebují ošetření jinou osobou.
Key services
Social services, Health services, Foster care support, Other related services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Hotjar, CookieYes, Bootstrap, Splide.js, Leaflet.js, Contact Form 7
Frameworks
Bootstrap 4.3.1
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
Cookie consent banner with detailed categories
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Use of Google reCAPTCHA
No visible vulnerable libraries
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights Google Analytics plugin
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
Content is in Czech language targeting local community and social service users.
Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed categories.
Multiple contact methods including email, phone, and contact forms are present.
Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools is evident.
No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious behavior detected.
WHOIS data is limited but consistent with a legitimate non-profit organization.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using PHP and JavaScript, with Bootstrap 4.3.1 providing responsive design capabilities. It integrates several third-party libraries and services including Google Fonts, Leaflet.js for interactive maps, Splide.js for sliders, Hotjar for user behavior analytics, and MonsterInsights for Google Analytics integration. CookieYes manages cookie consent with a detailed categorization of cookies. The site uses modern SEO practices including JSON-LD structured data and Open Graph metadata. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive layouts and mobile-specific content adjustments. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, though security header implementation is lacking. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with centrum-podebrady.info. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review centrum-podebrady.info.