Skip to main content

Security report for centrobill.com

Centrobill · Finance · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Centrobill is a specialized global payment gateway and FinTech provider focusing on high-risk payment processing and banking integration. Established in 2010, the company offers a comprehensive suite of services including subscription management, smart routing, risk management, and business services tailored for industries such as Forex, Adult entertainment, Dating, Gambling, Gaming, Software, and CBD. Their platform supports over 100 currencies and payment methods, positioning them as a key player in the high-risk payments market. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and PCI DSS Level 1 compliance claimed, though improvements are recommended in DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but lacking a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business profile, indicating legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching centrobill.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Centrobill operates in the niche high-risk payment processing sector, serving digital industries that face challenges in payment acceptance due to regulatory or risk factors. Their business model revolves around providing a unified payment gateway that integrates multiple acquirers and payment methods, enabling merchants to maximize transaction approvals and revenue. The company targets medium-sized businesses and enterprises in regulated or high-risk verticals, offering tailored solutions and extensive geographic coverage. Their competitive advantage lies in smart routing, subscription management, and risk mitigation tools. The presence of a reseller program and developer resources suggests a scalable and partner-friendly ecosystem. Growth indicators include recent feature launches and active marketing via social media and events.

Security posture

Centrobill demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced site-wide and claims of PCI DSS Level 1 compliance, which is critical for payment processors. The domain is protected against unauthorized transfers (clientTransferProhibited), and DNS is managed via Cloudflare, providing resilience and DDoS protection. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended enhancement to prevent DNS spoofing. No explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, representing a potential area for improvement. The website uses secure forms (Contact Form 7 with honeypot anti-spam), but no dedicated security or incident response policies or contacts are published. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism, which may expose the company to GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and optimize performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
CentroBill Ltd
VAT number
CY10392188X
Registration number
HE 392188
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Centrobill
Description
Centrobill is a global payment gateway and FinTech solution specializing in high-risk payment processing and banking integration. They offer flexible payment services for high-risk markets, supporting over 100 currencies and payment methods with features like subscription management, smart routing, risk management, and business services.
Key services
Payment Gateway Integration, Subscription Management, Smart Routing, Risk and Fraud Management, Business Services, Reporting and Analytics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Contact Form 7, Honeypot plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS
  • PCI DSS Level 1 compliance claimed

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear focus on high-risk payment solutions.
  3. Strong use of structured data and SEO best practices.
  4. No explicit cookie consent banner found, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  5. Contact information is present but no direct company emails found in HTML; phone numbers and addresses are in footer.
  6. Use of multiple marketing and analytics tools indicates extensive user tracking.
  7. Security headers not explicitly detected in provided data; recommend adding for enhanced security.
  8. Domain WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business continuity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js for UI components. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed and accessibility features. The use of Contact Form 7 with honeypot anti-spam enhances form security. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with centrobill.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review centrobill.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.