Skip to main content

Security report for centrissime.be

Maison du Tourisme Centrissime · Hospitality · Belgium

Partial score · DNS & email only

74/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Maison du Tourisme Centrissime operates as a regional tourism office for the Pays du Centre area in Belgium, providing comprehensive tourism information, event listings, and cultural highlights for 11 communes. The website is multilingual, targeting French, Dutch, and English-speaking visitors, and offers services such as guided tours, brochures, and bike rentals. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO, indicating a modern and maintainable infrastructure. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though improvements in security headers and published policies are recommended. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency but does not significantly detract from the site's legitimacy given its professional presentation and official tourism role.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 29 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching centrissime.be

This scan found 14 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
Average
74

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization positions itself as a key regional tourism promoter with a focus on cultural heritage, nature, and local events. Its business model revolves around providing information and services to tourists and visitors, likely funded by local government or tourism grants. The presence of social media channels and mobile optimization indicates engagement with modern marketing channels. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests reliance on contact forms and social media for communication. The website's SEO and structured data usage support discoverability and user engagement.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism, aligning with basic GDPR compliance. However, no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were detected, which is a compliance gap. Security headers are not present, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The WHOIS data is blocked, limiting domain registration transparency, which slightly impacts trust. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent, indicating room for improvement in security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information to demonstrate security readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider WHOIS privacy settings that balance transparency and privacy to improve domain trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Maison du Tourisme Centrissime
Description
Bienvenue sur le site web de Centrissime, la Maison du Tourisme du Pays du Centre ! Découvrez nos 11 communes et leurs trésors.
Key services
Tourism information, Guided tours, Brochures and maps, Event information, Bike rental and services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, JetMenu, Bootstrap 4.3.1, FontAwesome 5.8.1, jQuery
Frameworks
Elementor, Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Google Analytics (via Site Kit)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional tourism portal for Pays du Centre in Belgium
  2. Content is rich with tourism information, events, and local highlights
  3. Multilingual support with French, Dutch, and English versions
  4. Good SEO and structured data implementation
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact page likely contains forms
  6. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  7. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages detected in main HTML
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  9. WHOIS data is blocked, limiting domain registration transparency
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, ensuring good SEO and content management capabilities. It leverages Bootstrap for responsive design and FontAwesome for icons. Analytics are implemented via Google Analytics and Matomo, indicating a focus on user behavior tracking. The site is mobile optimized and uses lazy loading for images, improving performance. However, no advanced security headers were detected, and the hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading speed and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with centrissime.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review centrissime.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.