Skip to main content

Security report for centrefrantzfanon.org

Centre Frantz Fanon · Healthcare · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Centre Frantz Fanon is a French non-profit organization focused on providing psychological care and resources to persons in exile residing in the Occitanie region. The website presents a clear mission to improve access to mental health services, training for professionals, and advocacy work. The organization operates a care center, resource center, and interpreter co-therapy services, positioning itself as a specialized regional healthcare provider for vulnerable populations. Technically, the website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor and Yoast SEO, hosted by Ligne Web Services SAS dba LWS. The site is mobile-optimized with good design and navigation, though performance is moderate. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Security evaluation shows no blocking or WAF interference, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as missing contact information, reduces privacy compliance scores. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy with a clear social mission, but could improve privacy compliance and security hardening to enhance user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching centrefrantzfanon.org

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Centre Frantz Fanon operates in the healthcare and non-profit sectors, targeting exiled persons in France. Its business model centers on free psychological care, professional training, and advocacy, supported by regional and governmental partners. The organization leverages partnerships with entities like La Cimade and regional health agencies. The website content and domain age align with a legitimate, small-sized non-profit. Growth indicators include multilingual audio presentations and specialized university diplomas. The partnership ecosystem is regional and social service focused, with no commercial or advertising elements detected.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and domain registration status prevents unauthorized transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers such as CSP or HSTS were detected. No incident response or security policy information is published. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The site does not appear to use analytics or tracking scripts, reducing privacy risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhanced DNS security, security headers, and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and security.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Include clear contact information such as official emails and phone numbers to enhance trust and user support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Centre Frantz Fanon
Description
Le centre de soins et de ressources Frantz Fanon a pour objectif de renforcer l’accès aux soins psychiques pour les personnes en situation d’exil résidentes en région Occitanie.
Key services
Psychological care for exiled persons, Training for professionals in migration and health, Interpreter co-therapy services, Research, advocacy and action in mental health and social issues
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Elementor 3.32.4, Yoast SEO 26.1.1, jQuery 3.7.1, FontAwesome, OceanWP theme
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Elementor page builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in French targeting exiled persons in Occitanie region, France.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on homepage or linked menus.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content provided.
  5. Website uses modern WordPress ecosystem with Elementor and Yoast SEO.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  7. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  8. Security headers and advanced security policies are not visibly implemented.
  9. WHOIS data shows domain is registered with a reputable registrar and is not privacy protected.
  10. Website content is professional, focused on healthcare and social support services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a mature technical infrastructure. Hosting is provided by Ligne Web Services SAS dba LWS, a known French registrar and hosting provider. The site loads moderate performance scripts and styles, with mobile optimization and responsive design. No analytics or third-party tracking scripts were detected, which benefits privacy. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers represents technical debt and potential risk. The site structure and metadata are well-formed, including JSON-LD structured data for SEO and social sharing. Overall, the technical setup is solid but could be improved with enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with centrefrantzfanon.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review centrefrantzfanon.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.