Center Water Park is a small local business based in Riga, Latvia, specializing in same-day water activity rentals including flyboards, SUPs, kayaks, and inflatables. The website presents a professional and clean design with clear navigation and relevant content targeting general audiences interested in water sports and outdoor activities. The business model focuses on rental services with an emphasis on convenience and pre-booking to secure spots during peak times. The company maintains an active social media presence on Facebook and Instagram, enhancing customer engagement and brand visibility.
Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies such as Next.js and React, ensuring a responsive and performant user experience. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking, although no explicit cookie consent mechanism or privacy policies are present, indicating room for improvement in privacy compliance. The site is served over HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks security headers, which could enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
From a security perspective, the site shows a moderate security posture with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and incident response information suggests gaps in compliance and security best practices. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting the ability to fully assess domain legitimacy and registration consistency.
Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security hardening, and transparent business information to improve trustworthiness and regulatory adherence.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing X-Frame-Options header
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention centraudensparks.lv, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for centraudensparks.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Center Water Park operates in the hospitality sector, specifically focusing on water sports rentals in Riga. The company targets tourists and local enthusiasts seeking convenient same-day rentals of water activities. Its competitive advantage lies in offering a variety of water sports equipment with an easy booking process via an external platform. The business model is service-oriented with revenue generated from equipment rentals and terrace space rental. The company appears to be small-sized with no public information on founding year or parent company. Partnerships include the booking platform nomaspunkts.app and website development by AiOne.lv. Growth potential exists in expanding service offerings and improving digital presence. The lack of detailed business registration data and privacy policies may affect customer trust and regulatory compliance.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting readiness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and lack of GDPR indicators. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics without consent mechanisms raises privacy concerns. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.
Recommendations
Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
Add security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance web security.
Provide incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
Introduce cookie consent mechanisms to comply with privacy regulations and inform users about tracking.
Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust analysis.
No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
Contact information is present but no email addresses found.
Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram linked.
Uses modern web technologies (Next.js, React).
Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
No security headers detected in HTML content; SSL is enabled.
No forms detected on the main page; booking is done via external link.
Content is relevant and professional for a small local water activity rental business.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on a modern React and Next.js framework, enabling server-side rendering and good performance. It uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking user behavior. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and preloaded fonts and images for performance. However, accessibility features are basic and SEO optimization is minimal with only basic meta tags. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based build. The site loads multiple asynchronous JavaScript chunks, indicating modular code but potentially increasing load complexity. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and SEO improvements.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with centraudensparks.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review centraudensparks.lv.