Skip to main content

Security report for centralmaine.com

Maine Trust for Local News · Media · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CentralMaine.com is a regional news media website serving the Central Maine area, including Augusta and Waterville. It provides local news, sports, weather, and community event coverage primarily through the Kennebec Journal and Morning Sentinel publications. The site operates on a subscription and advertising business model, targeting residents and readers interested in local news. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with integrations such as Google Tag Manager, OneSignal for push notifications, and advertising networks including Google Ad Manager and Amazon Ads. The website demonstrates good technical maturity with HTTPS, security headers, and a responsive design, though some accessibility and privacy compliance aspects could be improved. Security posture is strong with no evident vulnerabilities, but the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies and missing WHOIS data reduce overall trust. The site is not blocked by WAFs and is fully accessible. Strategic recommendations include publishing clear privacy and cookie policies, adding vulnerability disclosure information, and enhancing accessibility compliance to improve user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching centralmaine.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
55
Email security
65
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CentralMaine.com holds a solid position as a regional news provider in the media sector, focusing on local news and community engagement. Its business model relies on subscription revenue complemented by advertising. The partnership with related sites like Press Herald and Sun Journal indicates a networked approach to regional news coverage. The site leverages multiple third-party services for advertising and analytics, reflecting a mature digital marketing strategy. Growth opportunities exist in expanding digital subscriptions and enhancing user engagement through newsletters and interactive content. The lack of detailed company registration or WHOIS transparency is a minor concern but does not detract from the site's operational legitimacy. Overall, the site targets a well-defined local audience with relevant content and services.

Security posture

The website exhibits a strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, including HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and Content-Security-Policy. Login forms are present and appear secured. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. The site uses several third-party scripts for advertising and analytics, which should be regularly audited to mitigate supply chain risks. Privacy compliance is basic, with no explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which could be a compliance gap under GDPR or similar regulations. Overall, the site is secure but would benefit from enhanced privacy and incident response disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt page to improve security transparency.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Provide clear incident response contact information to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Maine Trust for Local News
Description
Features news from the Kennebec Journal of Augusta, Maine and Morning Sentinel of Waterville, Maine. Serves Augusta, Hallowell, Manchester, Waterville and the Northern Kennebec Valley of central Maine.
Key services
News reporting, Sports coverage, Weather updates, Subscription-based content access, Digital ePapers, Photo purchase services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Publisher Tags, OneSignal Push Notifications, Parsely, Hashtaglabs, ElasticPress, SmugMug integration
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure login forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Parsely
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ad Manager (DoubleClick), Hashtaglabs, KueezRTB, Amazon Ads
Tracking pixels
Parsely, OneSignal
Marketing tools
Hashtaglabs, OneSignal
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional news media portal for Central Maine area.
  2. Content is rich with news, sports, weather, and local event information.
  3. Uses WordPress CMS with multiple third-party integrations.
  4. Has subscription and account management features.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages detected in provided content.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; site content is fully accessible.
  8. Security headers and HTTPS are properly implemented.
  9. Advertising and tracking scripts are present but standard for media sites.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and OneSignal for push notifications. It integrates advertising networks such as Google Ad Manager and Amazon Ads, and uses Parsely for content analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. Performance is moderate, with multiple external resources loaded, which could be optimized further. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site is hosted on an unknown provider but uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional media website but has room for optimization in performance and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with centralmaine.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review centralmaine.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.